期刊论文详细信息
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 卷:263
Scoping candidate minerals for stabilization of arsenic-bearing solid residuals
Article
Raghav, Madhumitha1  Shan, Jilei1  Saez, A. Eduardo1  Ela, Wendell P.1 
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, Tucson, AZ 85641 USA
关键词: Arsenic residuals;    Landfills;    Ferrous arsenate;    Schwertmannite;    Tooeleite;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.009
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Arsenic Crystallization Technology (ACT) is a potentially eco-friendly, effective technology for stabilization of arsenic-bearing solid residuals (ABSRs). The strategy is to convert ABSRs generated by water treatment facilities into minerals with a high arsenic capacity and long-term stability in mature, municipal solid waste landfills. Candidate minerals considered in this study include scorodite, arsenate hydroxyapatites, ferrous arsenates (symplesite-type minerals), tooeleite, and arsenated-schwertmannite. These minerals were evaluated as to ease of synthesis, applicability to use of iron-based ABSRs as a starting material, and arsenic leachability. The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) was used for preliminary assessment of candidate mineral leaching. Minerals that passed the TCLP and whose synthesis route was promising were subjected to a more aggressive leaching test using a simulated landfill leachate (SLL) solution. Scorodite and arsenate hydroxyapatites were not considered further because their synthesis conditions were not found to be favorable for general application. Tooeleite and silica-amended tooeleite showed high TCLP arsenic leaching and were also not investigated further. The synthesis process and leaching of ferrous arsenate and arsenated-schwertmannite were promising and of these, arsenatedschwertmannite was most stable during SLL testing. The latter two candidate minerals warrant synthesis optimization and more extensive testing. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_jhazmat_2013_10_009.pdf 992KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:3次 浏览次数:1次