Pricing the permission of pollution: Optimal control-based simulation of payments for the initial emission allowance in China

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

卷:174

Article

Guo, Mo^1,2  Zhang, Yongwei³  Ye, Weili²  Liu, Lingxuan⁴  Bi, Jun¹  Wang, Jinnan² 

[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China

[2] Chinese Acad Environm Planning, State Environm Protect Key Lab Environm Planning, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China

[3] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Elect & Informat, Zhenjiang 212003, Peoples R China

[4] Univ Lancaster, Sch Management, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England

关键词: Pricing;    Payment;    Initial emission allowance;    Optimal control-based;    Chemical oxygen demand;    Ammoniacal nitrogen;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.267

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

China has modified its pollution control policy system with such price tools as the pollution charge (PC) policy and the payment for initial emission allowance (PIEA) policy. The aim of PC policy is to compensate for the environment damage caused by pollutants, while PIEA is in charge of the initial emission allowance (IEA) within the emission trading system (ETS). However, since the implementation of PIEA, it has been criticized as redundant because of the similar pricing scheme with the PC. In addition, the existing PIEA pricing approaches have ignored interactions with other policies, such as PC and total emission control (TEC) policies. In this research, we established an optimal control-based model with chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N), two independent pollutants variables, to simulate the water pollutants' PIEA price. Simulation results indicated that emission quantity and optimal social benefit in the PC-PIEA combination scenario was equal to the situation in the PIEA scenario. Under this design, PC compensated for the emission damage, and PIEA paid for the scarcity rent, while PIEA does not duplicate the PC policy. In addition, the PIEA policy has a complex effect on pollutant emission. Because PIEA policy increases the enterprises' discharging cost, most regions' COD emissions are less than the baseline, excepting Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, and Guangdong, in which emission quantities are greater than the baseline. The NH3-N emission shows an opposite trend. The simulation result is that excluding Inner Mongolia, Hubei, Hunan, Tibet, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang, the NH3-N emissions in the rest of regions are increased. TEC policy has a significant effect on pollutant emissions and the PLEA price. The COD emission quantity with TEC is lower than that without the TEC policy, therefore, the TEC policy will be effective for pollutant emission control. The pollutant beyond the restricted target will be charged a payment for IEA at a higher price than without the TEC policy. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free