期刊论文详细信息
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION 卷:198
The Risk of Earth Destabilization (RED) index, aggregating the impact we make and what the planet can take
Article
Goossens, Yanne1,2  De Tavernier, Johan3  Geeraerd, Annemie1,2 
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Biosci Engn, Dept Biosyst, Div MeBioS, W de Croylaan 42,Box 2428, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Eth Arenberg, W de Croylaan 42,Box 2428, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Eth Arenberg, Sint Michielsstr 4,Box 3101, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词: Environmental performance;    Life cycle assessment;    Planetary boundaries;    Weighting;    Single score index;    Sustainability;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.284
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

The current golden standard for calculating the environmental impact of a product or process is the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, leading to results in a large number of impact categories, such as climate change, acidification and toxicity. In the absence of information on which impact category to prioritize, alike products cannot easily be compared and judging environmental sustainability remains difficult. To facilitate transparent communication about the sustainability of products and processes to all members in society, we present a novel environmental index: the Risk of Earth Destabilization (RED) index. Using weighting factors based on the Planetary Boundaries framework, the index takes into account the planetary urgency, and hence the risk of earth destabilization associated with each of the LCA impacts. The methodology proposed further refines the work done by Tuomisto et al. (2012), thereby contributing to the ongoing efforts within the EU Environmental Product Footprint project for developing weighting factors and building single score indices. A case study on meat consumption options (beef, pork, poultry) illustrates the broad applicability of the RED index and visualization options. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_06_284.pdf 2922KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:0次