The coproduction of electric mobility: Selectivity, conformity and fragmentation in the sociotechnical acceptance of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) standards

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

卷:207

Article

Kester, Johannes¹  Noel, Lance¹  Lin, Xiao¹  de Rubens, Gerardo Zarazua¹  Sovacool, Benjamin K.^1,2 

[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Ctr Energy Technol, Birk Ctr Pk 15, DK-7400 Herning, Denmark

[2] Univ Sussex, Sch Business Management & Econ, SPRU, Brighton, E Sussex, England

关键词: Coproduction;    Automotive manufacturing;    Vehicle-to-grid integration;    Transnational governance;    Electric vehicles;    ISO 15118;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.018

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

In this article we explore how a single standard dealing with vehicle-to-grid (V2G) mobility, ISO 15118, is coproduced in divergent ways across Asia, Europe, and North America. Specifically, ISO 15118 enables V2G as it oversees the communication between electric vehicles (EVs) and electric vehicle service equipment. It allows for bidirectional electricity flows and thereby offers electricity grids the use of EV batteries for grid services like frequency control and demand side management. We observe that highly technical and invisible standards like these are understudied in the energy literature and commonly misinterpreted as purely technical in scope. Hence in our contribution we offer such a study and use ISO 15118 to show how even in the most technical and invisible of cases, politics is still at work. We argue that standards, through a process of coproduction, are of vital importance for the governance of energy systems and play a major role in energy transitions through the various nontechnical assumptions scripted into them. Drawing from a synthesis of the literature on standardization, innovation studies, and science and technology studies, we thus analyse the implementation of ISO 15118 in the United States, China, Denmark and the Netherlands. We find a detailed technical standard that is implemented with differing degrees and in different sociotechnical and institutional contexts. We conclude by suggesting what this selectivity, compliance and fragmentation means for electric mobility and energy policymaking more generally. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free