Dealing with the eco-design paradox in research and development projects: The concept of sustainability assessment levels

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

卷:281

Article

Chebaeva, Natalia¹  Lettner, Miriam^2,3  Wenger, Julia¹  Schoeggl, Josef-Peter^4,5  Hesser, Franziska²  Holzer, Daniel¹  Stern, Tobias¹ 

[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Syst Sci Innovat & Sustainabil Res, Merangasse 18-1, A-8010 Graz, Austria

[2] Kompetenzzentrum Holz GmbH, Competence Ctr Wood Composites & Wood Chem, Wood K Plus, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria

[3] Univ Appl Sci Kufstein Tyrol, Andreas Hofer Str 7, A-6330 Kufstein, Austria

[4] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Christian Doppler Lab Sustainable Prod Management, Merangasse 18, A-8010 Graz, Austria

[5] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Ctr ECO2 Vehicle Design, Teknikringen 8, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden

关键词: Sustainability assessment;    Technological innovation;    Interdisciplinary research;    Correspondence analysis;    Cluster analysis;    Technology readiness level;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125232

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Although plenty of research has been carried out to develop a multitude of sustainability assessment methods, few guidelines and criteria have been established to help practitioners and researchers find the most appropriate method for a specific case. Studies have shown the importance of integrating sustainability assessments when conducting research and development activities, but have not provided direct links to available sustainability assessment methods. To address the so-called eco-design paradox, this paper describes a systematic classification system for the available sustainability assessment methods. To support the early integration of sustainability assessments in research and development, we inductively derived the concept of sustainability assessment levels from the well-known concept of technology readiness level. In total, 33 sustainability assessment methods were considered. We performed an expert-based correspondence analysis based on the availability of information to perform these methods and the demand for specific information at respective technology readiness level. Thereafter, a cluster analysis was performed, creating four distinct clusters which were finally interpreted as sustainability assessment levels. The provided concept supports interdisciplinary research projects in that it provides an overview of and guideline for possible sustainability assessment methods that match the respective technology readiness level. This enables researchers to integrate sustainability assessment into respective research and development projects and further modify and develop the theoretically synthetized concept based on empirical case studies. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

【 授权许可】

Free