Ecodesign of ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants: Economic and environmental multi-objective optimization

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION

卷:278

Article

Mayer, Martin Janos¹  Szilagyi, Artur¹  Grof, Gyula¹ 

[1] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Energy Engn, Muegyet Rkp 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary

关键词: Ecodesign;    Grid-connected photovoltaic plants;    Life-cycle assessment;    Multi-objective optimization;    Genetic algorithm;    Product environmental footprint;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123934

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Photovoltaic (PV) power is emission-free during operation. However, its life-cycle environmental impacts should be accounted for during the design phase. This paper presents the first methodology to calculate the product environmental footprint (PEF) and the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) based on a unified technical modeling framework of ground-mounted, grid-connected PV power plants. To test the model, we determined the singleand multiobjective optima of 8 main balance-of-system design parameters applying a genetic algorithm for a case study of two geographical locations with distinct solar resources. Results show that impacts can be reduced by 1-13% in each of the 16 different PEF environmental impact categories. Unfortunately, the different types of impacts cannot be reduced simultaneously with a single design solution, calling for the use of a weighted environmental footprint as the most favorable single-score environmental indicator. Pareto-optimal design solutions for multiple objectives show that increasing the AC/DC ratio, row distance, tilt angle, and cable losses compared to the economic optimum is beneficial for carbon and environmental footprint reduction. By accepting a small cost increase, the majority of the potential impact reduction can be achieved. Trade-offs between economic and environmental objectives are analyzed by assigning a price tag to environmental impacts. Based on the proposed weighting scheme, regions with polluting electricity production mix should choose the most profitable plant design for the largest environmental benefit. In other places eco-design could lead to a 1% overall impact reduction for just 0.1% extra cost. Balancing power requirements, copper recycling scenarios, the uncertainty of ecological impacts, and combined land use are identified as future research areas. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

【 授权许可】

Free