| JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY | 卷:433 |
| Subtle Influence of ACE2 Glycan Processing on SARS-CoV-2 Recognition | |
| Article | |
| Allen, Joel D.1  Watanabe, Yasunori1,2,3  Chawla, Himanshi1  Newby, Maddy L.1  Crispin, Max1  | |
| [1] Univ Southampton, Sch Biol Sci, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England | |
| [2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Glycobiol Inst, Dept Biochem, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QU, England | |
| [3] Univ Oxford, Wellcome Ctr Human Genet, Div Struct Biol, Oxford OX3 7BN, England | |
| 关键词: SARS-CoV-2; ACE2; glycosylation; surface plasmon resonance; glycan engineering; | |
| DOI : 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.166762 | |
| 来源: Elsevier | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection is highly variable and yet the molecular basis for this effect remains elusive. One potential contribution are differences in the glycosylation of target human cells, particularly as SARS-CoV-2 has the capacity to bind sialic acid which is a common, and highly variable, terminal modification of glycans. The viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 and the human cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) are both densely glycosylated. We therefore sought to investigate whether the glycosylation state of ACE2 impacts the interaction with SARS-CoV-2 viral spike. We generated a panel of engineered ACE2 glycoforms which were analyzed by mass spectrometry to reveal the site-specific glycan modifications. We then probed the impact of ACE2 glycosylation on S binding and revealed a subtle sensitivity with hypersialylated or oligomannose-type glycans slightly impeding the interaction. In contrast, deglycosylation of ACE2 did not influence SARS-CoV-2 binding. Overall, ACE2 glycosylation does not significantly influence viral spike binding. We suggest that any role of glycosylation in the pathobiology of SARS-CoV-2 will lie beyond its immediate impact of receptor glycosylation on virus binding. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10_1016_j_jmb_2020_166762.pdf | 1708KB |
PDF