Feasibility of grain-size analysis methods for determination of vertical hydraulic conductivity of streambeds

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY

卷:375

Article

Song, Jinxi^1,2  Chen, Xunhong¹  Cheng, Cheng¹  Wang, Deming¹  Lackey, Susan¹  Xu, Zongxue³ 

[1] Univ Nebraska, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA

[2] Northwest Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Xian 710069, Peoples R China

[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Water Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China

关键词: Vertical hydraulic conductivity;    Streambed;    Grain-size analysis;    In situ permeameter test;    The Elkhorn River;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.043

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Accurate estimation of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity (K-v) is of great importance in the analysis of water quantity exchange and solute transfer between a stream and its sediments. The paper analyzed the inaccuracy of hydraulic conductivity values of sediments derived from grain-size distribution (K-g), which were determined from eight empirical grain-size methods to represent streambed K-v. In this study, the values of K-v for a streambed were derived using falling-head standpipe permeameter tests conducted at eight study sites in the Elkhorn River, Nebraska, and the tested streambed columns were then collected for grain-size analysis by sieving. These empirical methods were used to calculate the K-g values of the streambed from grain-size distribution data of sediments. Unlike many other studies, this study verifies K-g from grain-size distribution with K-v from permeameter tests on the basis of the same samples of streambed sediments. The K-g values derived from the eight empirical methods were larger than the K-v from permeameter tests; there are five methods that give K-g values of about 3-6 times larger than these K-v. The K-g values from the Kozeny formula followed by the Hazen formula give the largest overestimation error if they are used to represent the K-v of the streambed. The USBR and Shepherd formulas generated K-g values close to K-v, but these K-g values are still larger in general than the K-v values. Moreover, the new values of coefficient C for the empirical formulas were revised so that they can be used to calculate the approximate K-v of a streambed. Among the eight methods, the ratios of the original C values to the average new C range from 1.3 to 5.9. It can be hypothesized that smaller C values must be used in the estimation of K-v for general soil samples if these empirical formulas are used to calculate K-v. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free