期刊论文详细信息
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 卷:96
Greater professional empathy leads to higher agreement about decisions made in the consultation
Article
Parkin, Tracey1  de Looy, Anne1  Farrand, Paul2 
[1] Univ Plymouth, Sch Hlth Profess, Plymouth PL6 8BH, Devon, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Mood Disorders Ctr, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词: Empathy;    Recall;    Agreement;    Decisions;    Outcomes;    Dietician;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.019
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objective: To examine the relationship between professional expression of empathy and agreement about decisions made in the consultation. Methods: Consultations between 86 individuals with diabetes and four dieticians were audio-recorded. Immediately following consultations patients and dieticians independently reported decisions made in a booklet. Audio-recordings were coded directly for empathy using an amended version of the empathic communication coding system (ECCS). Results: Empathy correlated significantly with patient and professional agreement about decisions made in the consultation (tau = .283, p = .0005). Multiple regression analysis indicates that for each dietician the greater the empathy the higher the level of agreement about decisions (p < .0005). Professional empathic response to patients statements of challenge was a significant factor in increasing agreement about decisions (p = .008). Conclusion: Results support the hypothesis that greater professional empathy will result in greater agreement about decisions made in consultations. Practice implications: Findings have implications for empathy training and provide guidance on the communication skills needed to support expression of empathy. Patient and professional agreement about decisions made provides a simple marker of effectiveness and highlights the importance of empathy as a seminal component of professional communication skills during a patient consultation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_pec_2014_04_019.pdf 214KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次