| PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING | 卷:61 |
| Changes in personal control as a predictor of quality of life after pulmonary rehabilitation | |
| Article | |
| Arnold, R ; Ranchor, AV ; Koëter, GH ; de Jongste, MJL ; Wempe, JB ; ten Hacken, NHT ; Otten, V ; Sanderman, R | |
| 关键词: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; quality of life; health status; personal control; self-efficacy; | |
| DOI : 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.015 | |
| 来源: Elsevier | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Objective: Perceptions of mastery and self-efficacy may be related to better outcomes in pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examined (1) whether patients with COPD improved during a rehabilitation programme with respect to quality of life (QoL) and perceptions of self-efficacy and mastery, and (2) whether increased perceptions of mastery and self-efficacy contributed to a higher QoL after rehabilitation. Methods: Thirty-nine consecutive CCPD patients (aged 60.5 +/- 9.0) were included from a rehabilitation centre and completed self-report questionnaires assessing symptoms, QoL, and perceptions of personal control. Results: COPID patients improved during rehabilitation in overall QoL and self-efficacy, although no significant changes were found in QoL domains and mastery. Changes in self-efficacy during rehabilitation contributed to the explanation of the social and psychological functioning QoL domains. Conclusion: Even in seriously impaired COPD patients in advanced stages of illness, positive changes in self-efficacy and overall well-being can be established during rehabilitation. Changes in self-efficacy were related to a better QoL, suggesting the importance of personal control in the adjustment to CCPD. Practice implications: Focussing more explicitly on the enhancement of perceptions of personal control in CCPD patients may be an important aim of pulmonary rehabilitation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10_1016_j_pec_2005_02_015.pdf | 246KB |
PDF