期刊论文详细信息
PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY 卷:110
Challenging the challenge hypothesis on testosterone in fathers: Limited meta-analytic support
Review
Meijer, Willemijn M.1  van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.2,3  Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.1,4 
[1] Vrije Univ, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Clin Child & Family Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Psychol Educ & Child Studies, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden Inst Brain & Cognit, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词: Testosterone;    Parenting;    Fathers;    Hormones;    Parental status;    Challenge hypothesis;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104435
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

In fathers testosterone levels are suggested to decrease in the context of caregiving, but results seem inconsistent. In a meta-analysis including 50 study outcomes with N = 7,080 male participants we distinguished three domains of research, relating testosterone levels to parental status (Hedges' g = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.35; N = 4,150), parenting quality (Hedges' g = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.24; N = 2,164), and reactivity after exposure to child stimuli (Hedges' g = 0.19, 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.42; N = 766). The sets of study outcomes on reactivity and on parenting quality were both homogeneous. Parental status and (higher) parenting quality were related to lower levels of testosterone, but according to conventional criteria combined effect sizes were small. Moderators did not significantly modify combined effect sizes. Results suggest that publication bias might have inflated the meta-analytic results, and the large effects of pioneering but small and underpowered studies in the domains of males' parental status and parenting quality have not been consistently replicated. Large studies with sufficient statistical power to detect small testosterone effects and, in particular, the moderating effects of the interplay with other endocrine systems and with contextual determinants are required.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_psyneuen_2019_104435.pdf 2231KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:12次 浏览次数:1次