期刊论文详细信息
PATTERN RECOGNITION 卷:120
Accuracy vs. complexity: A trade-off in visual question answering models
Article
Farazi, Moshiur1,2  Khan, Salman3  Barnes, Nick2 
[1] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org CSIRO, Data61, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ ANU, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Mohamed bin Zayed Univ Artificial Intelligence MB, Abu Dhabi 0000, U Arab Emirates
关键词: Visual question answering;    Visual feature extraction;    Language features;    Multi-modal fusion;    Speed-accuracy trade-off;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108106
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Visual Question Answering (VQA) has emerged as a Visual Turing Test to validate the reasoning ability of AI agents. The pivot to existing VQA models is the joint embedding that is learned by combining the visual features from an image and the semantic features from a given question. Consequently, a large body of literature has focused on developing complex joint embedding strategies coupled with visual attention mechanisms to effectively capture the interplay between these two modalities. However, modelling the visual and semantic features in a high dimensional (joint embedding) space is computationally expensive, and more complex models often result in trivial improvements in the VQA accuracy. In this work, we systematically study the trade-off between the model complexity and the performance on the VQA task. VQA models have a diverse architecture comprising of pre-processing, feature extraction, multi modal fusion, attention and final classification stages. We specifically focus on the effect of multi-modal fusion in VQA models that is typically the most expensive step in a VQA pipeline. Our thorough experimental evaluation leads us to three proposals, one optimized for minimal complexity, one for balanced complexity-accuracy and the last one for state-of-the-art VQA performance. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_patcog_2021_108106.pdf 2333KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:0次