| JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY | 卷:80 |
| Ixekizumab provides superior efficacy compared with ustekinumab over 52 weeks of treatment: Results from IXORA-S, a phase 3 study | |
| Article | |
| Paul, Carle1  Griffiths, Christopher E. M.2  van de Kerkhof, Peter C. M.3  Puig, Lluis4  Dutronc, Yves5  Henneges, Carsten5  Dossenbach, Martin5  Hollister, Kristin5  Reich, Kristian6,7  | |
| [1] Paul Sabatier Univ, CHU, Dept Dermatol, Toulouse, France | |
| [2] Univ Manchester, Dermatol Ctr, Salford Royal Hosp, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England | |
| [3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Dermatol, Nijmegen, Netherlands | |
| [4] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Santa Creu & St Pau, Barcelona, Spain | |
| [5] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA | |
| [6] Dermatologikum Berlin, Berlin, Germany | |
| [7] Georg August Univ Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany | |
| 关键词: biologic; clinical trial; efficacy; ixekizumab; IXORA-S; psoriasis; safety; ustekinumab; | |
| DOI : 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.039 | |
| 来源: Elsevier | |
PDF
|
|
【 摘 要 】
Background: Biologics targeting interleukin 17A (IL-17A) allow for rapid clearance of psoriatic plaques, with a clinically favorable safety profile. Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of ixekizumab, an IL-17A antagonist, with the safety and efficacy of the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab through 52 weeks of treatment in the head-to-head trial IXORA-S. Methods: Patients were randomized to ixekizumab (n = 136) or ustekinumab (n = 166) and dosed per the approved labels. After 1 year, efficacy was assessed via improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (with PASI 90 indicating a 90% or greater improvement from baseline PASI score) and a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) response of either 0 or 0 or 1, with dropouts counted as nonresponders. Safety analyses included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). Results: At week 52, significantly more ixekizumab-treated patients (P<.01) reported PASI 90 (104 [76.5%]), an sPGA response of 0 (72 [52.9%]), or an sPGA response of 0 or 1 (110 [82.1%]) responses than did ustekinumab-treated patients (PASI 90, 98 [59.0%]; sPGA response of 0, 60 [36.1%]; and sPGA response of 0 or 1, 108 [65.1%]). Treatment-emergent AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuation rates were not different between the treatment groups. Injection site reactions occurred more frequently in the ixekizumab-treated group (ixekizumab, 22 [16.3%]; ustekinumab, 2 [1.2%]) (P<.001). Limitations: This study was not designed to compare safety end points related to rare events. Conclusions: Compared with ustekinumab, ixekizumab showed superior efficacy and comparable safety outcomes through 52 weeks of treatment.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10_1016_j_jaad_2018_06_039.pdf | 1694KB |
PDF