The Hybrid Coronary Approach for Optimal Revascularization JACC Review Topic of the Week

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY

卷:76

Article

Moreno, Pedro R. ; Stone, Gregg W. ; Gonzalez-Lengua, Carlos A. ; Puskas, John D.

关键词: coronary artery bypass surgery;    drug-eluting stents;    hybrid coronary revascularization;    left anterior descending artery;    percutaneous coronary intervention;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.078

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Coronary revascularization is accomplished either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with low risk of immediate complications, or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), with improved long-term, event-free survival attributable to use of the left internal mammary artery graft. Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines both. The left internal mammary artery graft is done by sternal-sparing approaches or by robotic-assisted, endoscopic surgery. HCR reduces bleeding, ventilator time, and length of stay compared with traditional CABG. Compared with PCI, HCR offers the durability and survival advantages of the left internal mammary artery. The large-scale National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, randomized Hybrid Trial (Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial) was initiated to examine whether HCR is superior to multivessel PCI. However, enrollment was suboptimal, triggering premature study discontinuation. HCR integrates the positive features of both PCI and CABG, albeit requiring 2 procedures rather than 1. Adequately powered randomized trials are required to evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of HCR compared with CABG and multivessel PCI alone. (c) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

【 授权许可】

Free