JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY | 卷:52 |
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography | |
Article | |
Rumberger, John A. | |
关键词: CT angiography; diagnosis; coronary angiography; MDCT; coronary CTA; | |
DOI : 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.034 | |
来源: Elsevier | |
【 摘 要 】
In this issue of the Journal, Budoff et al. (1) publish results from the ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial comparing non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with invasive quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) for definition of atherosclerotic luminal narrowing at the 50% and/or 70% stenosis levels. At first glance my reaction was, Oh, no, not another 64-slice CT scan 'validation' report looking at sensitivity (Se)/specificity (Sp) for finding obstructive coronary disease! Didn't I just read a similar report in JACC, JAMA, Circulation, etc.! However, this was and is not the case.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
10_1016_j_jacc_2008_08_034.pdf | 68KB | download |