N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide-Guided, Intensive Patient Management in Addition to Multidisciplinary Care in Chronic Heart Failure A 3-Arm, Prospective, Randomized Pilot Study

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY

卷:55

Article

Berger, Rudolf¹  Moertl, Deddo¹  Peter, Sieglinde¹  Ahmadi, Roozbeh¹  Huelsmann, Martin¹  Yamuti, Susan²  Wagner, Brunhilde³  Pacher, Richard¹ 

[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Cardiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

[2] Hosp Hietzing, Dept Cardiol, Vienna, Austria

[3] Hosp Sozialmed, Zentrum Ost, Dept Cardiol, Vienna, Austria

关键词: chronic heart failure;    multidisciplinary care;    nurse;    natriuretic peptide;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.078

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Objectives This study was designed to investigate whether the addition of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide-guided, intensive patient management (BM) to multidisciplinary care (MC) improves outcome in patients following hospitalization due to heart failure (HF). Background Patients hospitalized due to HF experience frequent rehospitalizations and high mortality. Methods Patients hospitalized due to HF were randomized to BM, MC, or usual care (UC). Multidisciplinary care included 2 consultations from an HF specialist who provided therapeutic recommendations and home care by a specialized HF nurse. In addition, BM included intensified up-titration of medication by HF specialists in high-risk patients. NT-proBNP was used to define the level of risk and to monitor wall stress. This monitoring allowed for anticipation of cardiac decompensation and adjustment of medication in advance. Results A total of 278 patients were randomized in 8 Viennese hospitals. After 12 months, the BM group had the highest proportion of antineurohormonal triple-therapy (difference among all groups). Accordingly, BM reduced days of HF hospitalization (488 days) compared with the hospitalization for the MC (1,254 days) and UC (1,588 days) groups (p < 0.0001; significant differences among all groups). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the first HF rehospitalization (28%) was lower in the BM versus MC groups (40%; p = 0.06) and the MC versus UC groups (61%; p = 0.01). Moreover, the combined end point of death or HF rehospitalization was lower in the BM (37%) than in the MC group (50%; p < 0.05) and in the MC than in the UC group (65%; p = 0.04). Death rate was similar between the BM (22%) and MC groups (22%), but was lower compared with the UC group (39%; vs. BM: p < 0.02; vs. MC: p < 0.02). Conclusions Compared with MC alone, additional BM improves clinical outcome in patients after HF hospitalization. (BNP Guided Care in Addition to Multidisciplinary Care; NCT00355017) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:645-53) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

【 授权许可】

Free