期刊论文详细信息
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY 卷:57
The Impact of Patient and Lesion Complexity on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes After Revascularization With Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents A Substudy of the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
Article
Serruys, Patrick W.2  Silber, Sigmund3  van Geuns, Robert J.2  Richardt, Gert4  Buszman, Pawel E.5  Kelbaek, Henning6  van Boven, Adrianus J.7  Hofma, Sjoerd H.7  Linke, Axel8  Klauss, Volker9  Wijns, William10  Macaya, Carlos11  Garot, Philippe12  Di Mario, Carlo13  Manoharan, Ganesh14  Kornowski, Ran15  Ischinger, Thomas16  Bartorelli, Antonio L.17  Gobbens, Pierre18  Windecker, Stephan1 
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Dept Cardiol, Swiss Cardiovasc Ctr Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Kardiol Praxis & Praxisklin, Munich, Germany
[4] Segeberger Kliniken, Herzzentrum, Bad Segeberg, Germany
[5] Med Univ Silesia, Katowice, Poland
[6] Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Med Ctr Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
[8] Herzzentrum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
[9] Univ Hosp Munich Innenstadt, Dept Cardiol, Munich, Germany
[10] Onze Lieve Vrouw Hosp, Cardiovasc Ctr Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
[11] Univ Hosp, Serv Cardiol, Madrid, Spain
[12] Inst Cardiovasc Paris Sud, Quincy, France
[13] Royal Brompton Hosp, Dept Cardiol, London SW3 6LY, England
[14] Royal Victoria Hosp, Belfast BT12 6BA, Antrim, North Ireland
[15] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Cardiol, Rabin Med Ctr, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[16] Hosp Bogenhausen, Dept Cardiol, Munich, Germany
[17] Univ Milan, IRCCS, Ctr Cardiol Monzino, Milan, Italy
[18] Cardialysis, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词: complex;    drug-eluting stent;    everolimus;    off-label;    zotarolimus;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.036
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of patient and lesion complexity on outcomes with newer-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES). Background Clinical and angiographic outcomes of newer-generation stents have not been described among complex patients. Methods Patients enrolled in the RESOLUTE All Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) were stratified into complex and simple. Results Of 2,292 patients, 1,520 (66.3%) were complex and treated with ZES (n = 764) or EES (n = 756). Event rates were higher among complex patients, and results did not differ between ZES and EES, regardless of complexity. At 1 year, target lesion failure was 8.9% in ZES- and 9.7% in EES-treated complex patients (p = 0.66) and 6.8% in ZES- and 5.7% in EES-treated simple patients (p = 0.55). Rates of cardiac death (1.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.24), target-vessel myocardial infarction (4.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.90), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (4.4% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.80) were similar for both stent types among complex patients. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 20 (1.3%) complex patients with no difference between ZES (1.7%) and EES (0.9%, p = 0.26). Angiographic follow-up showed similar results for ZES and EES in terms of in-stent percentage diameter stenosis (22.2 +/- 15.4% vs. 21.4 +/- 15.8%, p = 0.67) and in-segment binary restenosis (6.6% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.82) in the complex group. Conclusions In this all-comers randomized trial, major adverse cardiovascular events were more frequent among complex than simple patients. The newer-generation ZES and EES proved to be safe and effective, regardless of complexity, with similar clinical and angiographic outcomes for both stent types through 1 year. (RESOLUTE-III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT00617084) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 2221-32) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_jacc_2011_01_036.pdf 1401KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次