The social patterning of electronic nicotin'e delivery system use among US adults

PREVENTIVE MEDICINE

卷:116

Article

Glover, LaShaunta M.¹  Ma, Jennie Z.²  Kesh, Anshula³  Tompkins, Lindsay K.⁴  Hart, Joy L.⁵  Mattingly, Delvon T.⁵  Walker, Kandi⁵  Robertson, Rose Marie³  Payne, Tom⁶  Sims, Mario¹ 

[1] Univ Mississippi, Dept Med, Med Ctr, Jackson, MS 39216 USA

[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA

[3] Amer Stroke Assoc, Amer Heart Assoc, Dallas, TX 75231 USA

[4] Univ Louisville, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Louisville, KY 40292 USA

[5] Univ Louisville, Dept Commun, Louisville, KY 40292 USA

[6] Univ Mississippi, Dept Otolaryngol & Commun Sci, Med Ctr, Jackson, MS 39216 USA

关键词: ENDS;    E-cigarettes;    Vaping;    Socioeconomic status;    Social patterning;    A-TRAC;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.038

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

There is little research examining the social patterning of electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use. This study investigated the association between socioeconomic status (SES) (education, income, and employment status) and current and former ENDS use. Data were collected from 2561 participants from the American Heart Association Tobacco Regulatory and Addiction Center (A-TRAC) online survey. Participants were 18-64 years old and reported demographic, SES, and ENDS use. Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR 95% confidence interval-CI) of participants' current and former (vs. never) ENDS use. Models were adjusted for age, sex, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, marital status, and reasons for ENDS use. In the unadjusted analysis, ENDS use was primarily patterned by education and employment status. College educated persons (vs. those with less than a high school diploma) had a 37% greater prevalence of current ENDS use (PR 1.37, 95% CI 1.20-1.55), and a 16% greater prevalence of former ENDS use (PR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.28) in the fully-adjusted model. Persons with household incomes above $90 K (vs. less than $20,000) had a greater prevalence of current (PR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.41) and former (PR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30) ENDS use. Those who were employed (vs. not employed) had a 13% greater prevalence of current ENDS use (PR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.19) after full adjustment. Higher SES (vs. lower SES) persons were more likely to use ENDS.

【 授权许可】

Free