期刊论文详细信息
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT 卷:245
SAR-enhanced mapping of live fuel moisture content
Article
Rao, Krishna1  Williams, A. Park2  Flefil, Jacqueline Fortin3  Konings, Alexandra G.1 
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词: Live fuel moisture content;    Wildfire;    Forest fire;    Western USA;    Synthetic aperture radar;    Landsat;    Sentinel-1;    Neural network;    Deep learning;    Drought stress;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.rse.2020.111797
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Assessing wildfire risk presents several challenges due to uncertainty in fuel flammability and ignition potential. Live fuel moisture content (LFMC) - the mass of water per unit dry biomass in vegetation - exerts a direct control on fuel ignitability, fuel availability and fire spread, and is thus an important parameter in assessing wildfire risk. Current estimates of LFMC from optical remote sensing or meteorological indices are insufficient to accurately map LFMC at landscape scale. In this study, we present a physics-assisted recurrent neural network model for mapping LFMC every 15 days at 250 m resolution over the western US using microwave backscatter (from Sentinel-1) and optical reflectance (from Landsat-8). The model was physics-assisted by adding handcrafted inputs representing radiative transfer processes and related parameters. Field data from the National Fuel Moisture Database was used to train the deep learning model. The model had a satisfactory overall predictability of R-2 = 0.63, RMSE = 25.0% and bias = 1.9% when cross-validated at 125 sites. The model was substantially better at predicting site-means (R-2 = 0.71 and RMSE = 14.3%) as compared to site-anomalies (R-2 = 0.55 and RMSE = 21.3%). Of the 6 land cover types tested, the model was most accurate in predicting LFMC in shrub-lands (R-2 = 0.69), while closed broadleaf deciduous sites had the least accuracy (R-2 = 0.49). Incorporating microwave backscatter as a model input significantly enhanced performance (R-2 increasing from 0.44 to 0.63, and RMSE decreasing from 31.8% to 25.0%). Microwave backscatter therefore presents a complementary source of information to optical remote sensing metrics for LFMC mapping. The high resolution dynamic LFMC maps presented here may assist in improved wildfire risk characterization and also have potential applications in quantifying plant drought stress at large scales.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_rse_2020_111797.pdf 2447KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次