Estimating the fractional cover of growth forms and bare surface in savannas. A multi-resolution approach based on regression tree ensembles

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT

卷:129

Article

Gessner, Ursula^1,2  Machwitz, Miriam^1,3  Conrad, Christopher¹  Dech, Stefan^1,2 

[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Remote Sensing, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany

[2] German Remote Sensing Data Ctr DFD, German Aerosp Ctr DLR, D-82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany

[3] Ctr Rech Publ Gabriel Lippmann, Dept Environm & Agrobiotechnol EVA, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg

关键词: Sub-pixel fractional cover;    Savanna;    Grassland and shrubland biome;    Africa;    Vegetation structure;    Land cover;    Multi-resolution analysis;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.026

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Evaluations of existing land cover maps have revealed that high landscape heterogeneity and small patch sizes are a major reason for misclassification. These problems globally occur in biomes of mixed vegetation structure and are particularly relevant for African savannas. This paper presents a multi-resolution approach to derive fractional cover of vegetation growth forms at sub-pixel level, aiming at an improved mapping of land cover in the African grassland, savanna and shrubland biome. Fractional cover is delineated for woody growth forms (trees and shrubs), herbaceous growth forms, and bare surface. The approach incorporates very high resolution (QuickBird/IKONOS, 0.6-1 m), high resolution (Landsat TM/ETM+, 30 m), and medium resolution data (MODIS, 250 m). While QuickBird/IKONOS data are classified into discrete classes, at Landsat and MODIS resolutions, sub-pixel cover is delineated using non-parametric ensemble regression trees from the random forest family. The propagation of errors in the hierarchical multi-resolution approach is assessed with Monte Carlos simulations. The multi-resolution approach allows the adequate description of the heterogeneous vegetation structure in selected study regions of Southern Africa The RMSE of the delineated fractional cover values range between 3.1% and 8.2% when compared with higher resolution data and between 4.4% and 9.9% when compared with field surveys. Errors at the Landsat resolution show minor influence on the accuracy of the MODIS results. Regarding the inter-resolution error propagation, for 90% of the Monte Carlo simulations, errors at the Landsat resolution resulted in RMSEs for MODIS increased by less than 4% (woody vegetation), 3.5% (herbaceous vegetation) and 2% (bare surface). (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free