REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE | 卷:33 |
Corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone: an individual patient data meta-analysis | |
Article | |
Griesinger, Georg1  Boostanfar, Robert2  Gordon, Keith3  Gates, Davis3  Sisk, Christine McCrary3  Stegmann, Barbara J.3  | |
[1] Univ Clin Schleswig Holstein, Dept Reprod Med & Gynecol Endocrinol, Campus Luebeck, Lubeck, Germany | |
[2] Huntington Reprod Ctr, Encino, CA USA | |
[3] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA | |
关键词: corifollitropin alfa; GnRH antagonist; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; ovarian stimulation; pregnancy; | |
DOI : 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.005 | |
来源: Elsevier | |
【 摘 要 】
A meta-analysis was conducted of individual patient data (n = 3292) from three randomized controlled trials of corifollitropin alfa versus rFSH: Engage (150 mu g corifollitropin alfa n = 756; 200 IU rFSH n = 750), Ensure (100 mu g corifollitropin alfa n = 268; 150 IU rFSH n = 128), and Pursue (150 mu g corifollitropin alfa n = 694; 300 IU rFSH n = 696). Women with regular menstrual cycles aged 18-36 and body weight >60 kg (Engage) or <= 60 kg (Ensure), or women aged 35-42 years and body weight >= 50 kg (Pursue), received a single injection (100 mu g or 150 mu g) of corifollitropin alfa (based on body weight and age) or daily rFSH. The difference (corifollitropin alfa minus rFSH) in the number of oocytes retrieved was +1.0 (95% CI: 0.5-1.5); vital pregnancy rate: -2.2% (95% CI: -5.3%-0.9%); ongoing pregnancy rate: -1.7% (95% CI: -4.7%-1.4%); and live birth rate: -2.0% (95% CI: -5.0%-1.1%). The odds ratio for overall OHSS was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.82-1.61), and for moderate-to-severe OHSS: 1.29 (95% CI: 0.81-2.05). A single dose of corifollitropin alfa for the first 7 days of ovarian stimulation is a generally well-tolerated and similarly effective treatment compared with daily rFSH. (C) 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
【 授权许可】
Free
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
10_1016_j_rbmo_2016_04_005.pdf | 498KB | download |