期刊论文详细信息
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE 卷:35
Curvilinear relationship between age and assisted reproduction technique success: retrospective analyses of US National ART Surveillance System data from 2010-2014
Article
Yavas, Yalcin1,2 
[1] Stats ART, 1202 NW 180th Ave, Pembroke Pines, FL 33029 USA
[2] Palm Beach Fertil Ctr, 7015 Beracasa Way,Suite 201, Boca Raton, FL 33433 USA
关键词: Age;    Assisted reproductive technology;    IVF;    Live birth;    Mathematical model;    NASS;   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.07.018
来源: Elsevier
PDF
【 摘 要 】

In assisted reproduction technique cycles using fresh autologous embryos, the pattern by which outcomes per started cycle (live birth and clinical pregnancy) and per clinical pregnancy (live birth and miscarriage) change with age was determined. A dataset was created with 488,351 cycles. Success rates changed with age following well-fitted, n-shaped curvilinear (quadratic, cubic, quartic) regressions. These rates increased steadily from age < 24-28 years (P = 0.001; P = 0.02; P = 0.04; respectively) with positive slopes (P = 0.03); live birth and pregnancy rates per cycle were lower in women aged < 25 years versus women aged 25-28 years (P = 0.0002; P = 0.01, respectively), and declined steadily thereafter with negative slopes (P < 0.0001). The initial increase occurred at decreasing rates; subsequent decline occurred at increasing rates. Women aged < 29 years with successful outcomes were older than those who were unsuccessful (P = 0.001; P = 0.04; P = 0.001; respectively); those with successful outcomes were younger in other age groups (P < 0.0001). Miscarriage followed similar but reverse boolean OR-shaped curvilinear regressions. Age-driven decline in success rates begins < 30 years and occurs at increasing rates, suggesting that women > 30 years old with infertility should not delay assisted reproduction, if it is their only option. (C) 2017 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free   

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
10_1016_j_rbmo_2017_07_018.pdf 1328KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次