The influence of the administration method on scores of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale in old age

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH

卷:197

Article

de Waal, Margot W. M.¹  van der Weele, Gerda M.¹  van der Mast, Roos C.²  Assendelft, Willem J. J.¹  Gussekloo, Jacobijn¹ 

[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care V0 P, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands

[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands

关键词: Rating scales;    Agreement;    Depression;    Psychometrics;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.psychres.2011.08.019

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Many rating scales can be self-administered or interviewer-administered, and the influence of administration method on scores is unclear. We aimed to study this influence on scores of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), used as a screening instrument in general practice. In two general practices 376 registered patients aged 75 years and older were asked to participate. Exclusion criteria were dementia and current treatment for depression. The GDS-15 was administered twice within 1 month: self-administered by mail, and interviewer-administered during home visits. The sequence of administering the methods was different for the two practices. We analyzed differences in total and item GDS-scores. Of 141 subjects who participated (response rate 55%) 59 were men (42%). Mean age was 81.4 years (SD 4.8). When the GDS-15 was self-administered, 33 subjects (23.4%) left items unanswered. There were no items unanswered when the GDS-15 was interviewer-administered. On average the self-administered total GDS scores were 0.70 points higher than interviewer-administered scores (95% confidence interval = 0.41; 0.98), with a large range of variation in the scores (limits of agreement -2.69 to 4.08). Item-item comparisons showed high percentages of agreement. Chance-corrected agreement (kappa) was moderate to fair, but three items showed only slight agreement (kappa values <0.21). In conclusion, compared to interviewer-administered scores, scores on the GDS-15 when self-administered were higher. The method of administration should be taken into account when interpreting scores. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

【 授权许可】

Free