Predicting microstructure and strength for AISI 304L stainless steel forgings

MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING

卷:745

Article

Switzner, N. T.¹  Sawyer, E. T.²  Everhart, W. A.¹  Hanlin, R. L.² 

[1] Exponent, 149 Commonwealth Dr, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA

[2] Honeywell Fed Mfg & Technol LLC, 14520 Botts Rd, Kansas City, MO 64147 USA

关键词: Forging;    304L stainless steel;    Strain;    BCJ model;    Simulation;    Deformation temperature;    Mechanical properties;   

DOI  :  10.1016/j.msea.2018.12.054

来源: Elsevier

【 摘 要 】

Specially designed billets of AISI 304L stainless steel were forged at two temperatures, 843 degrees C and 941 degrees C, and with varying transfer times. The machined 304L billets were thick near the center (51 mm) and thin near the periphery (10 mm) such that forging with a flat platen resulted in regions of high strain (center) and low strain (periphery). Multiple metallographic samples were extracted from one experimental forging for each temperature (water quenched forging with nominal transfer times). Microstructural analysis revealed that recrystallization initiated at about 1.4 plastic strain for forgings made at 843 degrees C and 1.1 plastic strain for 941 degrees C. Mechanical tests-performed using tensile bars from multiple locations from each forging-revealed that the resulting yield strength increased with strain up similar to 10-20% recrystallization, then decreased. Coupled thermo-mechanical simulations estimated a temperature increase of up to 162 degrees C in the center of the forging due to rapid deformation in the High Energy Rate Forging (HERE) press. Simulation using updated BCJ model parameters for 304L stainless steel predicted the strain distributions using the scalar value, equivalent plastic strain. The predicted trends for percent recrystallization and yield strength from this simulation (using the internal state variable BCJ model) agreed qualitatively with experimental tensile test results, but the quantitative comparison leaves room for improvement. Both the simulation and the experimental results clarify that the microstructure and strength of 304L forgings are difficult to control in a forging with excessive strain variation. It is recommended that strain variation be minimized and overall strain be kept under similar to 0.5 to best control the strength and grain structure of 304L stainless steel. Excessive transfer time appeared to have little effect on the forging yield strength, but air cooling and die cooling after forging indicated softening for the forgings made at 941 degrees C.

【 授权许可】

Free