Metacognitions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a psychometric study of the metacognitions questionnaire-30

Frontiers in Psychology

Psychology

Jonas Christoffer Lindstrøm¹  Costas Papageorgiou²  Gunnar Einvik³  Toril Dammen⁴ 

[1] Department of Method Development and Analytics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway;Health Services Research Unit (HØKH), Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway;Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway;Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of Research and Innovation, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway;

关键词: chronic obstructive lung disease;    metacognitions;    anxiety;    depression;    psychometrics;    metacognitive therapy;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265102

 received in 2023-07-21, accepted in 2023-09-22,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

The metacognitions questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) was developed for the assessment of metacognitive beliefs and processes that are central components of the metacognitive model of emotional disorders. Anxiety and depression commonly occur in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Testing such a model for anxiety and depression in patients with COPD is warranted. However, the psychometric properties of the MCQ-30 in COPD patients are unknown. Therefore, in this study we aimed to examine these properties in COPD patients. The MCQ-30 was administered to 203 COPD patients referred to a rehabilitation unit in respiratory medicine. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the five-factor as well as the bi-factor models of MCQ-30. Exploratory factor analyses were also performed. Both models did not meet the criteria for an acceptable fit on Comparative Fit Index (CFI) of 0.810 and 0.858 vs. criterion of ≥0.9, but the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) criterion ≤0.08 was acceptable for both models with RMSEA = 0.074 and 0.066, respectively. The factors were mostly moderately correlated (0.41–0.58) with acceptable reliability coefficients (0.73–0.87). The exploratory factor analysis identified three of the five factors originally described in the five-factor model of the MCQ-30. These data show that the factor structure of the MCQ-30 appears to differ from that of the original instrument in COPD patients and further studies are needed to confirm its validity and reliability in this patient group.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Dammen, Papageorgiou, Lindstrøm and Einvik.