期刊论文详细信息
Frontiers in Oncology
Efficacy and safety of zolbetuximab for first-line treatment of advanced Claudin 18. 2-positive gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Oncology
Huatang Zhang1  Cantu Fang1  Zhanpeng Liang1  Luzhen Li1  Liwen Liu1  Jiaming Wu1  Huiqin Lai1  Wenxia Li1 
[1] Department of Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan, China;
关键词: zolbetuximab;    Claudin18.2;    gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma;    targeted therapy;    meta-analysis;   
DOI  :  10.3389/fonc.2023.1258347
 received in 2023-07-13, accepted in 2023-09-15,  发布年份 2023
来源: Frontiers
PDF
【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveZolbetuximab is a “first-in-class” chimeric lgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting Claudin18.2 (CLDN 18.2). In recent years, several important trials have been published showing that zolbetuximab is associated with improved prognosis in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. This promises great change to the current treatment landscape. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zolbetuximab for first-line treatment of advanced CLDN 18. 2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.MethodsThe following databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (updated 10 June 2023). All randomized trials comparing zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy versus first-line chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced CLDN 18. 2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 (Cochrane collaboration software). Primary outcomes and measures included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).ResultsThis systematic review and meta-analysis included three randomized controlled studies involving 1,402 patients (699 receiving zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy and 703 receiving chemotherapy alone). Compared with chemotherapy alone, zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.68–0.84) and PFS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.50–0.82), but did not result in a higher ORR (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.82–1.03). Further analysis of CLDN 18.2 expression showed a more significant benefit for OS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55–0.87; p = 0.002) and PFS (HR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.44–0.84; p = 0.003) from zolbetuximab in patients with high expression, while there was significant benefit in patients with lower expression. In terms of AEs, zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy was associated with higher risk of grade 3 and higher AEs, but increased risk of nausea and vomiting were more common.ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the effect of zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy was superior to that of chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced CLDN 18.2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Thus, zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy represents a new first-line treatment for these patients. Zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy was associated with higher risk of grade 3 and higher AEs, but was generally manageable.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42023437126).

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Liang, Liu, Li, Lai, Li, Wu, Zhang and Fang

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311148338208ZK.pdf 1166KB PDF download
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:0次