Frontiers in Public Health | |
Exploring the relationships among safety leadership, safety climate, psychological contract of safety, risk perception, safety compliance, and safety outcomes | |
Public Health | |
Colin Pilbeam1  Hossein Karimi2  Gholamreza Moradi3  Leila Omidi4  Saeid Mousavi5  | |
[1] Cranfield Safety and Accident Investigation Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom;Department of Health, Safety, and Environment, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran;Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran;Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; | |
关键词: safety leadership; safety climate; psychological contract of safety; deep compliance; surface compliance; | |
DOI : 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1235214 | |
received in 2023-06-12, accepted in 2023-10-04, 发布年份 2023 | |
来源: Frontiers | |
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundRecently, two types of safety compliance behaviors including deep compliance and surface compliance were differentiated. The current study aimed to investigate the relationships among safety leadership, safety climate, psychological contract of safety (PCS), risk perception, and deep compliance and surface compliance behavior of workers. In addition, the effects of both deep and surface compliance on safety outcomes were considered.MethodsWorkers’ perceptions in terms of safety leadership, safety climate, PCS, risk perception, deep compliance, and surface compliance were measured by appropriate questionnaires. Three questions were asked to measure undesired safety outcomes. Structural equation modeling and correlation analysis were applied to examine the research model and relationships among variables.Results and discussionThe results of the current study showed that deep compliance was positively predicted by safety leadership, safety climate, and PCS and negatively predicted by risk perception. Surface compliance was positively predicted by safety leadership and safety climate and negatively predicted by risk perception. Surface compliance is not significantly predicted by PCS. With regard to the adverse safety outcomes, the results showed that both deep and surface compliance were negatively associated with adverse safety outcomes, however, deep compliance had a stronger negative correlation with adverse safety outcomes than surface compliance.
【 授权许可】
Unknown
Copyright © 2023 Omidi, Karimi, Pilbeam, Mousavi and Moradi.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202311147383691ZK.pdf | 513KB | download |