Structural validity and internal consistency of an outcome measure to assess self-reported educator capacity to support children with motor difficulties

Frontiers in Education

Education

Cindy DeCola¹  Leah Dix¹  Peter T. Cahill²  Wenonah N. Campbell³  Cheryl A. Missiuna³ 

[1] CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;

关键词: Partnering for Change;    occupational therapy;    structural validity;    internal consistency;    motor disorders;    capacity building;    children;    schools;   

DOI  :  10.3389/feduc.2023.1174097

 received in 2023-05-23, accepted in 2023-09-26,  发布年份 2023

来源: Frontiers

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPartnering for Change (P4C) is a school-based occupational therapy service intended to build the capacity of educators to support children with motor difficulties.AimsThis paper describes the development of the Partnering for Change Educator Questionnaire and evaluates its structural validity and internal consistency.Methods and proceduresThe P4C Educator Questionnaire was completed by 1,216 educators four times across 2 years. Data from the initial time point were analysed via exploratory factor analysis (n = 436). Subsequently, Cronbach’s alpha and mean interitem correlations were calculated. Finally, the proposed factor structure was confirmed by testing it against data from times two through four using confirmatory factor analysis (n = 688).Outcomes and resultsA three-factor structure was evident and confirmed in hypothesis testing. The factor structure was interpretable according to the framework for building educator capacity used in this study. Internal consistency was high, with the total scale outperforming each subscale.Conclusions and implicationsA novel measure of educator self-reported capacity to support students with motor difficulties demonstrated structural validity and internal consistency. We currently recommend use as a complete scale accompanied by additional validation research.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
Copyright © 2023 Cahill, Missiuna, DeCola, Dix and Campbell.