期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Eating Disorders
Relationship between disgust and orthorexia nervosa and psychometric properties of the Italian Dusseldorf orthorexia scale in a general population sample
Research
Gabriella Martino1  Matteo Aloi2  Martina Moniaci3  Marco Tullio Liuzza4  Marianna Rania5  Elvira Anna Carbone6  Cristina Segura-Garcia6 
[1] Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy;Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy;Department of Health Sciences, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy;Department of Health Sciences, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy;Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy;Outpatient Unit for Clinical Research and Treatment of Eating Disorders, University Hospital “Mater Domini”, Catanzaro, Italy;Outpatient Unit for Clinical Research and Treatment of Eating Disorders, University Hospital “Mater Domini”, Catanzaro, Italy;Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy;
关键词: Orthorexia nervosa;    Measurement invariance;    Error covariance;    Disgust sensitivity;    Nomological validity;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s40337-023-00899-5
 received in 2023-07-13, accepted in 2023-09-21,  发布年份 2023
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIt remains unclear among clinicians and researchers whether orthorexia nervosa (ON) is a part of the obsessive–compulsive disorder spectrum or eating disorders. Disgust seems to be a shared psychopathological factor in these clinical presentations, indicating a potentially crucial role in ON. On the other hand, numerous psychometric tools have been developed to evaluate ON. The Dusseldorf Orthorexia Scale (DOS) was recently validated in an Italian sample. However, the study's primary limitation was that the scale was only administered to undergraduate university students. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties (including factorial structure, reliability, and measurement invariance conditional on sex) of the Italian version of the DOS (I-DOS) on a sample from the general population. Additionally, the study sought to determine the nomological validity of the I-DOS by examining its relationship with disgust sensitivity.MethodsA sample of 521 participants took part in this study and completed a battery that assessed ON and disgust sensitivity. To assess the I-DOS structure, reliability, and measurement invariance we respectively conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), computed McDonalds’s omega, and performed hierarchical series of multigroup CFAs. Then, we tested the relationship between ON and disgust sensitivity.ResultsCFA confirmed the unifactorial model of I-DOS and it respected the configural, metric, and strict invariance while a partial scalar invariance was achieved. It also showed good reliability with an omega of 0.87. In addition, we found a positive relationship between ON and disgust sensitivity, thus confirming the nomological validity of I-DOS.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the Italian version of the Dusseldorf orthorexia scale (I-DOS) exhibits strong psychometric properties and can be an effective instrument for assessing ON in a general population sample. Notably, the most significant and innovative outcome was the positive correlation between ON and disgust sensitivity. As disgust has been linked to other clinical presentations, this preliminary result could serve as a foundation for future research exploring this phenomenon in greater detail.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311109202165ZK.pdf 1320KB PDF download
12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq24.gif 1KB Image download
13690_2023_1196_Figa_HTML.png 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 130KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

13690_2023_1196_Figa_HTML.png

12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq24.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:1次 浏览次数:0次