期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genetics
Trypanotolerance in N’Dama x Boran crosses under natural trypanosome challenge: effect of test-year environment, gender, and breed composition
Research Article
Abraham Korol1  Morris Soller2  Charles N Kimwele3  Leonard Munga4  Steve Kemp5  Olivier Hanotte6  Caleb O Orenge7  John P Gibson8 
[1] Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, 31905, Haifa, Israel;Department of Genetics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904, Jerusalem, Israel;Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya;Kenya Agricultural Research Institute - Trypanosomiasis Research Centre (KARI-TRC), P.O. Box 362, Kikuyu, Kenya;School of Biological sciences, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZB, Liverpool, UK;International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya;School of Biology, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK;South Eastern University College (A constituent college of the University of Nairobi), P.O. Box 170–90200, Kitui, Kenya;Kenya Agricultural Research Institute - Trypanosomiasis Research Centre (KARI-TRC), P.O. Box 362, Kikuyu, Kenya;The Centre for Genetic Analysis and Applications, University of New England, 235, Armidale, NSW, Australia;
关键词: Trypanotolerance;    Tsetse challenge;    N’Dama;    Boran;    N’Dama x Boran crosses;    Gender effect;    Sub-Saharan Africa;   
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2156-13-87
 received in 2012-06-05, accepted in 2012-10-11,  发布年份 2012
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundTrypanosomosis, a protozoal disease affecting livestock, transmitted by Glossina (tsetse) flies is a major constraint to agricultural production in Sub-Saharan Africa. It is accepted that utilization of the native trypanotolerance exhibited in some of the African cattle breeds to improve trypanotolerance of more productive but susceptible breeds, will offer a cost effective and sustainable solution to the problem. The success of this approach is based on the premise that quantitative trait loci previously identified under relatively controlled situations confer useful trypanotolerance under natural field situations. As part of a study to authenticate this hypothesis, a population of 192 cattle, consisting of six batches of N’Dama and Kenya-Boran backcross animals [(N’Dama x Kenya-Boran) x Kenya-Boran] born over the period 2002 to 2006 was constructed. Some of the batches also included pure Kenya-Boran cattle, or N’Dama x Kenya- Boran F1 animals. Each batch was exposed as yearlings to natural field trypanosomosis challenge over a period of about one year; the entire challenge period extending from December 2003 to June 2007. Performance of the animals was evaluated by weekly or biweekly measurements of body weight, packed blood cell volume (PCV), parasitemia score, and number of trypanocide treatments. From these basic data, 49 phenotypes were constructed reflecting dynamics of body weight, packed cell volume (PCV) and parasitemia under challenge.ResultsFemales were distinctly more trypanotolerant than males. F1, backcross and pure Kenya- Boran animals ranked in that order with respect to trypanotolerance. Overall batch effects were highly significant (p<0.001) for most traits, and were generally more significant than the gender or genetic type effects. The superior trypanotolerance of the F1 animals was expressed in all three components of animal defense strategies against pathogens: Avoidance resistance, and tolerance.ConclusionsThe results show that trypanotolerance derived from the N’Dama is expressed under field conditions; and that the trait is primarily additive in nature, being expressed in heterozygous condition and in a three-quarters Boran genetic background. The results further, underscore the complexity of the trait in the field manifesting all three host disease-control strategies, and show the importance of gender and local environmental conditions in determining response to challenge.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Orenge et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311108890799ZK.pdf 498KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:6次 浏览次数:1次