期刊论文详细信息
BMC Gastroenterology
A screening instrument to identify ulcerative colitis patients with the high possibility of current non-adherence to aminosalicylate medication based on the Health Belief Model: a cross-sectional study
Research Article
Masakazu Nishigaki1  Noriko Yamamoto-Mitani1  Makoto Tanaka2  Naoki Yoshimura3  Shin Maeda4  Reiko Kunisaki5  Aki Kawakami6  Ryoichi Suzuki7 
[1] Department of Adult Nursing, Graduate school of Medicine the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, 113-0033, Bunkyo-ku, Japan;Department of Advanced Clinical Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, 113-0033, Bunkyo-kuTokyo, Japan;Department of Gastroenterology, Social Insurance Central General Hospital, 3-22-1 Hyakuninn-cho, 169-0073, Shinjyuku-kuTokyo, Japan;Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, 236-0004, Kanazawa-kuYokohama, Japan;Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, 232-0024, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan;Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, 232-0024, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan;Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, 236-0004, Kanazawa-kuYokohama, Japan;Kannai Suzuki Clinic, 3-28 Onoue-cho, 231-0028, Naka-ku, Yokohama, Japan;
关键词: Ulcerative colitis;    Medication adherence;    Aminosalicylates;    Health belief model;    Screening;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12876-014-0220-z
 received in 2014-09-03, accepted in 2014-12-11,  发布年份 2014
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundNon-adherence to aminosalicylates is observed among 30% to 45% of patients with ulcerative colitis and increases the risk of relapse. The Health Belief Model is a theoretical model that could offer a broader perspective to improve patients’ self-medication adherence. This study aimed to develop a screening instrument based on the Health Belief Model to screen patients with ulcerative colitis who had a high possibility of current non-adherence to aminosalicylates. The study was also designed to allow examination of factors of non-adherence.MethodsA multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis and prescribed aminosalicylates. Non-adherence was defined as taking less than 80% of the prescribed dose. We hypothesized that there was a significant relationship between current aminosalicylate non-adherence and five components of the HBM: beliefs about taking aminosalicylates, disease characteristics, medication characteristics, abdominal symptoms, and sociodemographic characteristics. A logistic regression model was applied and the coefficients converted to a numeric scores in order to develop a screening instrument which could reliably discriminate non-adherent and adherent subjects.ResultsNon-adherence was observed in 127 (29.6%) of the 429 enrolled subjects. Lower perceptions of belief in taking aminosalicylates, absence of visible bleeding, eight daily tablets or less taken, and no concomitant use of thiopurines were related to non-adherence. We then developed a screening instrument comprising 22 items. When the cut-off point was set at 60, the instrument showed 85.0% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity with an area under the curve of 0.84 (95% confidence interval = 0.79–0.91).ConclusionsThe instrument appeared to be reliable for identifying patients with a high possibility of current non-adherence to aminosalicylates. Further, the instrument may provide useful information for detecting patients with a high possibility of current non-adherence and for assessing factors of non-adherence. On the other hand, we need to evaluate disease activity more strictly and examine whether it is included in the screening instrument in the future.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Kawakami et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311108801092ZK.pdf 778KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:2次