期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genetics
Increased prediction accuracy using a genomic feature model including prior information on quantitative trait locus regions in purebred Danish Duroc pigs
Research Article
Pernille Sarup1  Just Jensen1  Peter Sørensen1  Tage Ostersen2  Mark Henryon2 
[1] Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830, Tjele, Denmark;SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre, Axeltorv 3, 1609, Copenhagen V, Denmark;
关键词: Genomic feature models;    GFBLUP;    Feed efficiency;    Average daily gain;    Meat percent;    Growth;    Genomic prediction;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12863-015-0322-9
 received in 2015-09-08, accepted in 2015-12-20,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn animal breeding, genetic variance for complex traits is often estimated using linear mixed models that incorporate information from single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers using a realized genomic relationship matrix. In such models, individual genetic markers are weighted equally and genomic variation is treated as a “black box.” This approach is useful for selecting animals with high genetic potential, but it does not generate or utilise knowledge of the biological mechanisms underlying trait variation. Here we propose a linear mixed-model approach that can evaluate the collective effects of sets of SNPs and thereby open the “black box.” The described genomic feature best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP) model has two components that are defined by genomic features.ResultsWe analysed data on average daily gain, feed efficiency, and lean meat percentage from 3,085 Duroc boars, along with genotypes from a 60 K SNP chip. In addition information on known quantitative trait loci (QTL) from the animal QTL database was integrated in the GFBLUP as a genomic feature. Our results showed that the most significant QTL categories were indeed biologically meaningful. Additionally, for high heritability traits, prediction accuracy was improved by the incorporation of biological knowledge in prediction models. A simulation study using the real genotypes and simulated phenotypes demonstrated challenges regarding detection of causal variants in low to medium heritability traits.ConclusionsThe GFBLUP model showed increased predictive ability when enough causal variants were included in the genomic feature to explain over 10 % of the genomic variance, and when dilution by non-causal markers was minimal. In the observed data set, predictive ability was increased by the inclusion of prior QTL information obtained outside the training data set, but only for the trait with highest heritability.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Sarup et al. 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311108569200ZK.pdf 1418KB PDF download
Fig. 4 1137KB Image download
Fig. 3 1009KB Image download
MediaObjects/12894_2023_1340_MOESM1_ESM.docx 25KB Other download
Fig. 2 401KB Image download
Fig. 2 531KB Image download
650KB Image download
Fig. 2 470KB Image download
12936_2015_665_Article_IEq1.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 5 784KB Image download
Fig. 2 1046KB Image download
Fig. 4 945KB Image download
2300KB Image download
Fig. 4 372KB Image download
Fig. 1 93KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2020_1739_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 221KB PDF download
Fig. 2 1052KB Image download
Fig. 4 2985KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2020_1739_MOESM2_ESM.tif 27281KB Other download
Fig. 5 1132KB Image download
Fig. 3 186KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2023_2851_MOESM3_ESM.docx 183KB Other download
Fig. 4 777KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2023_2851_MOESM4_ESM.docx 18KB Other download
Fig. 3 1153KB Image download
12864_2023_9693_Article_IEq1.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/40249_2023_1145_MOESM2_ESM.docx 37KB Other download
Fig. 5 893KB Image download
Fig. 7 2851KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2023_2851_MOESM8_ESM.docx 44KB Other download
Fig. 1 161KB Image download
601KB Image download
Fig. 1 252KB Image download
Fig. 6 194KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 7

Fig. 5

12864_2023_9693_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

12936_2015_665_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:4次 浏览次数:0次