Phylogenomics and sequence-structure-function relationships in the GmrSD family of Type IV restriction enzymes

BMC Bioinformatics

Research Article

Katarzyna H. Kaminska¹  Stanislaw Dunin-Horkawicz¹  Magdalena A. Machnicka¹  Janusz M. Bujnicki² 

[1] Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, ul. Ks. Trojdena 4, PL-02-109, Warsaw, Poland;Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, ul. Ks. Trojdena 4, PL-02-109, Warsaw, Poland;Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Umultowska 89, PL-61-614, Poznan, Poland;

关键词: Restriction-Modification systems;    Modification-Dependent systems;    Type IV;    Comparative genomics;    Defense islands;    Fold recognition;    HNH endonuclease;    ParB/Srx fold;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12859-015-0773-z

 received in 2015-05-21, accepted in 2015-10-13,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundGmrSD is a modification-dependent restriction endonuclease that specifically targets and cleaves glucosylated hydroxymethylcytosine (glc-HMC) modified DNA. It is encoded either as two separate single-domain GmrS and GmrD proteins or as a single protein carrying both domains. Previous studies suggested that GmrS acts as endonuclease and NTPase whereas GmrD binds DNA.MethodsIn this work we applied homology detection, sequence conservation analysis, fold recognition and homology modeling methods to study sequence-structure-function relationships in the GmrSD restriction endonucleases family. We also analyzed the phylogeny and genomic context of the family members.ResultsResults of our comparative genomics study show that GmrS exhibits similarity to proteins from the ParB/Srx fold which can have both NTPase and nuclease activity. In contrast to the previous studies though, we attribute the nuclease activity also to GmrD as we found it to contain the HNH endonuclease motif. We revealed residues potentially important for structure and function in both domains. Moreover, we found that GmrSD systems exist predominantly as a fused, double-domain form rather than as a heterodimer and that their homologs are often encoded in regions enriched in defense and gene mobility-related elements. Finally, phylogenetic reconstructions of GmrS and GmrD domains revealed that they coevolved and only few GmrSD systems appear to be assembled from distantly related GmrS and GmrD components.ConclusionsOur study provides insight into sequence-structure-function relationships in the yet poorly characterized family of Type IV restriction enzymes. Comparative genomics allowed to propose possible role of GmrD domain in the function of the GmrSD enzyme and possible active sites of both GmrS and GmrD domains. Presented results can guide further experimental characterization of these enzymes.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Machnicka et al. 2015