Optimizing transformations for automated, high throughput analysis of flow cytometry data

BMC Bioinformatics

Methodology Article

Juan-Manuel Perez¹  Andrew Weng²  Greg Finak³  Raphael Gottardo³ 

[1] Computational Biology Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, 110 Pine Ave West, H2W 1R7, Montreal, QC, Canada;Terry Fox Laboratory, 675 West 10th Avenue Vancouver, V5Z 1L3, BC, Canada;Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fariview Ave N, 98109, Seattle, WA, USA;

关键词: Data Transformation;    Transformation Parameter;    Misclassification Rate;    Flow Cytometry Data;    Untransformed Data;   

DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2105-11-546

 received in 2010-05-28, accepted in 2010-11-04,  发布年份 2010

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundIn a high throughput setting, effective flow cytometry data analysis depends heavily on proper data preprocessing. While usual preprocessing steps of quality assessment, outlier removal, normalization, and gating have received considerable scrutiny from the community, the influence of data transformation on the output of high throughput analysis has been largely overlooked. Flow cytometry measurements can vary over several orders of magnitude, cell populations can have variances that depend on their mean fluorescence intensities, and may exhibit heavily-skewed distributions. Consequently, the choice of data transformation can influence the output of automated gating. An appropriate data transformation aids in data visualization and gating of cell populations across the range of data. Experience shows that the choice of transformation is data specific. Our goal here is to compare the performance of different transformations applied to flow cytometry data in the context of automated gating in a high throughput, fully automated setting. We examine the most common transformations used in flow cytometry, including the generalized hyperbolic arcsine, biexponential, linlog, and generalized Box-Cox, all within the BioConductor flowCore framework that is widely used in high throughput, automated flow cytometry data analysis. All of these transformations have adjustable parameters whose effects upon the data are non-intuitive for most users. By making some modelling assumptions about the transformed data, we develop maximum likelihood criteria to optimize parameter choice for these different transformations.ResultsWe compare the performance of parameter-optimized and default-parameter (in flowCore) data transformations on real and simulated data by measuring the variation in the locations of cell populations across samples, discovered via automated gating in both the scatter and fluorescence channels. We find that parameter-optimized transformations improve visualization, reduce variability in the location of discovered cell populations across samples, and decrease the misclassification (mis-gating) of individual events when compared to default-parameter counterparts.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the preferred transformation for fluorescence channels is a parameter- optimized biexponential or generalized Box-Cox, in accordance with current best practices. Interestingly, for populations in the scatter channels, we find that the optimized hyperbolic arcsine may be a better choice in a high-throughput setting than current standard practice of no transformation. However, generally speaking, the choice of transformation remains data-dependent. We have implemented our algorithm in the BioConductor package, flowTrans, which is publicly available.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Finak et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010