International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity | |
The SOS-framework (Systems of Sedentary behaviours): an international transdisciplinary consensus framework for the study of determinants, research priorities and policy on sedentary behaviour across the life course: a DEDIPAC-study | |
Research | |
Neville Owen1  Julie-Anne Nazare2  Grainne O’Donoghue3  Jeroen Lakerveld4  Johannes Brug4  Greet Cardon5  Marieke De Craemer5  Nanna Lien6  Jean-Michel Oppert7  Sebastien F. M. Chastin8  Christoph Buck9  Michelle Holdsworth1,10  Claire Bernaards1,11  | |
[1] Baker IDI, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;CARMEN, Inserm U1060, Université de Lyon 1, Inra U1235, Lyon, France;Centre for Preventive Medicine, School of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland;Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health & Care Research, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium;Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Department of nutrition, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Institute of cardiometabolism and nutrition (ICAN), Pitie-Salpêtrière hospital (AP-HP), Paris, France;Institute for Applied Health Research, School of Health and Life Science, Glasgow Caledonian University, G4 0BA, Glasgow, UK;Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology- BIPS, Bremen, Germany;Public Health Section, School of Health and Related Research-ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK;TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands; | |
关键词: Sitting; Sedentary behaviour; Determinants; Youth; Adults; Older adults; Ageing; Life-course; System-based approach; Environment; Concept mapping; Policy; Europe; Public health; | |
DOI : 10.1186/s12966-016-0409-3 | |
received in 2016-03-04, accepted in 2016-07-08, 发布年份 2016 | |
来源: Springer | |
【 摘 要 】
BackgroundEcological models are currently the most used approaches to classify and conceptualise determinants of sedentary behaviour, but these approaches are limited in their ability to capture the complexity of and interplay between determinants. The aim of the project described here was to develop a transdisciplinary dynamic framework, grounded in a system-based approach, for research on determinants of sedentary behaviour across the life span and intervention and policy planning and evaluation.MethodsA comprehensive concept mapping approach was used to develop the Systems Of Sedentary behaviours (SOS) framework, involving four main phases: (1) preparation, (2) generation of statements, (3) structuring (sorting and ranking), and (4) analysis and interpretation. The first two phases were undertaken between December 2013 and February 2015 by the DEDIPAC KH team (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity Knowledge Hub). The last two phases were completed during a two-day consensus meeting in June 2015.ResultsDuring the first phase, 550 factors regarding sedentary behaviour were listed across three age groups (i.e., youths, adults and older adults), which were reduced to a final list of 190 life course factors in phase 2 used during the consensus meeting. In total, 69 international delegates, seven invited experts and one concept mapping consultant attended the consensus meeting. The final framework obtained during that meeting consisted of six clusters of determinants: Physical Health and Wellbeing (71 % consensus), Social and Cultural Context (59 % consensus), Built and Natural Environment (65 % consensus), Psychology and Behaviour (80 % consensus), Politics and Economics (78 % consensus), and Institutional and Home Settings (78 % consensus). Conducting studies on Institutional Settings was ranked as the first research priority. The view that this framework captures a system-based map of determinants of sedentary behaviour was expressed by 89 % of the participants.ConclusionThrough an international transdisciplinary consensus process, the SOS framework was developed for the determinants of sedentary behaviour through the life course. Investigating the influence of Institutional and Home Settings was deemed to be the most important area of research to focus on at present and potentially the most modifiable. The SOS framework can be used as an important tool to prioritise future research and to develop policies to reduce sedentary time.
【 授权许可】
CC BY
© The Author(s). 2016
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
RO202311108358458ZK.pdf | 2692KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
- [5]
- [6]
- [7]
- [8]
- [9]
- [10]
- [11]
- [12]
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
- [16]
- [17]
- [18]
- [19]
- [20]
- [21]
- [22]
- [23]
- [24]
- [25]
- [26]
- [27]
- [28]
- [29]
- [30]
- [31]
- [32]
- [33]
- [34]
- [35]
- [36]
- [37]
- [38]
- [39]
- [40]
- [41]
- [42]
- [43]