Comparison of the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among overweight and obesity populations in China

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Research

Meixuan Li¹  Tianqi Hong²  Weihua Guo³  Dingyao Wang³  Jing Wu³  Shitong Xie³ 

[1] Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China;School of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China;Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China;

关键词: Health-related quality of life;    Health state utility value;    EQ-5D-5L;    SF-6Dv2;    Measurement properties;    Overweight;    Obesity;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12955-023-02202-1

 received in 2023-09-14, accepted in 2023-10-23,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among Chinese overweight and obesity populations.MethodsA representative sample of Chinese overweight and obesity populations was recruited stratified by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and area of residence. Social-demographic characteristics and self-reported EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 responses were collected through the online survey. The agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Convergent validity and known-group validity were examined using Spearman’s rank correlation and effect sizes, respectively. The test-retest reliability was assessed using among a subgroup of the total sample. Sensitivity was compared using relative efficiency and receiver operating characteristic.ResultsA total of 1000 respondents (52.0% male, mean age 51.7 years, 67.7% overweight, 32.3% obesity) were included in this study. A higher ceiling effect was observed in EQ-5D-5L than in SF-6Dv2 (30.6% vs. 2.1%). The mean (SD) utility was 0.851 (0.195) for EQ-5D-5L and 0.734 (0.164) for SF-6Dv2, with the ICC of the total sample was 0.639 (p < 0.001). The Spearman’s rank correlation (range: 0.186–0.739) indicated an acceptable convergent validity between the dimensions of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2. The EQ-5D-5L showed basically equivalent discriminative capacities with the SF-6Dv2 (ES: 0.517–1.885 vs. 0.383–2.329). The ICC between the two tests were 0.939 for EQ-5D-5L and 0.972 for SF-6Dv2 among the subgroup (N = 150). The SF-6Dv2 had 3.7–170.1% higher efficiency than the EQ-5D-5L at detecting differences in self-reported health status, while the EQ-5D-5L was found to be 16.4% more efficient at distinguishing between respondents with diabetes and non-diabetes.ConclusionsBoth the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 showed comparable reliability, validity, and sensitivity when used in Chinese overweight and obesity populations. The two measures may not be interchangeable given the systematic difference in utility values between the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2. More research is needed to compare the responsiveness.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

Fig. 3