期刊论文详细信息
Malaria Journal
Measuring ex vivo drug susceptibility in Plasmodium vivax isolates from Cambodia
Research
Mariusz Wojnarski1  Charlotte A. Lanteri1  Chatchadaporn Thamnurak1  Chanthap Lon1  Siratchana Sundrakes1  Kritsanai Yingyuen1  Douglas S. Walsh1  Soklyda Chann1  Michele D. Spring1  Chantida Praditpol1  Sorayut Chattrakarn1  Suwanna Chaorattanakawee2  David L. Saunders3  Jonathan J. Juliano4  Jessica Lin4  Jaymin C. Patel4  Nareth Kong5  Yom You5  Rekol Huy5  Kheang Heng Thay5 
[1] Department of Immunology and Medicine, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science, Bangkok, Thailand;Department of Immunology and Medicine, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science, Bangkok, Thailand;Department of Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand;Department of Immunology and Medicine, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science, Bangkok, Thailand;US Army Medical Materiel Development Activity, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD, USA;Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;National Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia;
关键词: Drug resistance;    Plasmodium vivax;    Cambodia;    Ex vivo assay;    pvmdr1;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12936-017-2034-2
 received in 2017-06-05, accepted in 2017-09-19,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundWhile intensive Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance surveillance continues in Cambodia, relatively little is known about Plasmodium vivax drug resistance in Cambodia or elsewhere. To investigate P. vivax anti-malarial susceptibility in Cambodia, 76 fresh P. vivax isolates collected from Oddar Meanchey (northern Cambodia) in 2013–2015 were assessed for ex vivo drug susceptibility using the microscopy-based schizont maturation test (SMT) and a Plasmodium pan-species lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) ELISA. P. vivax multidrug resistance gene 1 (pvmdr1) mutations, and copy number were analysed in a subset of isolates.ResultsEx vivo testing was interpretable in 80% of isolates using the pLDH-ELISA, but only 25% with the SMT. Plasmodium vivax drug susceptibility by pLDH-ELISA was directly compared with 58 P. falciparum isolates collected from the same locations in 2013–4, tested by histidine-rich protein-2 ELISA. Median pLDH-ELISA IC50 of P. vivax isolates was significantly lower for dihydroartemisinin (3.4 vs 6.3 nM), artesunate (3.2 vs 5.7 nM), and chloroquine (22.1 vs 103.8 nM) than P. falciparum but higher for mefloquine (92 vs 66 nM). There were not significant differences for lumefantrine or doxycycline. Both P. vivax and P. falciparum had comparable median piperaquine IC50 (106.5 vs 123.8 nM), but some P. falciparum isolates were able to grow in much higher concentrations above the normal standard range used, attaining up to 100-fold greater IC50s than P. vivax. A high percentage of P. vivax isolates had pvmdr1 Y976F (78%) and F1076L (83%) mutations but none had pvmdr1 amplification.ConclusionThe findings of high P. vivax IC50 to mefloquine and piperaquine, but not chloroquine, suggest significant drug pressure from drugs used to treat multidrug resistant P. falciparum in Cambodia. Plasmodium vivax isolates are frequently exposed to mefloquine and piperaquine due to mixed infections and the long elimination half-life of these drugs. Difficulty distinguishing infection due to relapsing hypnozoites versus blood-stage recrudescence complicates clinical detection of P. vivax resistance, while well-validated molecular markers of chloroquine resistance remain elusive. The pLDH assay may be a useful adjunctive tool for monitoring for emerging drug resistance, though more thorough validation is needed. Given high grade clinical chloroquine resistance observed recently in neighbouring countries, low chloroquine IC50 values seen here should not be interpreted as susceptibility in the absence of clinical data. Incorporating pLDH monitoring with therapeutic efficacy studies for individuals with P. vivax will help to further validate this field-expedient method.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311108018680ZK.pdf 1354KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  • [54]
  • [55]
  • [56]
  • [57]
  • [58]
  • [59]
  • [60]
  • [61]
  • [62]
  • [63]
  • [64]
  • [65]
  • [66]
  • [67]
  • [68]
  • [69]
  • [70]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:7次 浏览次数:0次