期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genomics
Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea)
Research Article
Shijun Xiao1  Zhiyong Wang1  Qiurong Wang1  Linsong Dong1 
[1] Key Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples’ Republic of China;
关键词: Large yellow croaker;    Genotyping-by-sequencing;    Genomic selection;    Predictive ability;    Genome-wide association study;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12864-016-2756-5
 received in 2016-02-08, accepted in 2016-05-19,  发布年份 2016
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundThe advances of sequencing technology accelerate the development of theory of molecular quantitative genetics such as QTL mapping, genome-wide association study and genomic selection. This paper was designed to study genomic selection in large yellow croaker breeding. The aims of this study were: (i) to estimate heritability values of traits in large yellow croaker; (ii) to assess feasibility of genomic selection in the traits of growth rate and meat quality; (iii) to compare predictive accuracies affected by different algorithms and training sizes, and to find what training sizes could reach ideal accuracies; (iv) to compare results of GWAS with genomic prediction, and to assess feasibility of pre-selection of significant SNPs in genomic selection. 500 individuals were tested in the trait of body weight and body length, while 176 were tested in the percentage of n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids (n-3HUFA) in muscle. GBLUP and emBayesB were used to perform genomic prediction.ResultsGenotyping-By-Sequencing method was used to construct the libraries for the NGS sequencing and find ~30,000 SNPs. Heritability estimates were 0.604, 0.586 and 0.438 for trait of body weight, body length and n-3HUFA, respectively. The predictive abilities estimated by GBLUP showed higher than that by emBayesB in traits of body weight and body length. However, the result was just the opposite in n-3HUFA. According to fit the curve of predictive accuracy, we estimated that at least 1000 individuals in training set could reach an accuracy of 0.8 in body weight and body length. GBLUP, emBayesB and GWAS could not always find significant SNPs associated with phenotypes consistently. Significant SNPs were selected by emBayesB could obtain the largest proportions to explain total additive genetic variances.ConclusionsThis research showed that genomic selection was feasible in large yellow croaker breeding. We suggest doing a test before deciding to use which algorithm in specific trait in genomic prediction. We estimated required training sizes to reach ideal predictive accuracies and assessed feasibility of pre-selection of SNPs successfully. Because of high mortality rate of fish and high cost in genomic sequencing, genomic selection may be more suitable for applying on some traits which cannot be measured on candidates directly.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311107188817ZK.pdf 3051KB PDF download
12951_2016_171_Article_IEq5.gif 1KB Image download
MediaObjects/13100_2023_304_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 1473KB PDF download
Fig. 2 159KB Image download
Fig. 1 849KB Image download
Fig. 5 40KB Image download
Fig. 1 806KB Image download
Fig. 3 447KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2023_2865_MOESM4_ESM.tif 8864KB Other download
12944_2023_1932_Article_IEq1.gif 1KB Image download
Fig. 1 93KB Image download
MediaObjects/13046_2020_1739_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 221KB PDF download
Fig. 2 1052KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

12944_2023_1932_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

12951_2016_171_Article_IEq5.gif

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:8次 浏览次数:0次