General practitioners’ perceptions of working with the certification of sickness absences following changes in the Swedish social security system: a qualitative focus-group study

BMC Family Practice

Research Article

Lars Carlsson¹  Thorne Wallman²  Linda Lännerström²  Inger K Holmström³ 

[1] Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine Section, Uppsala University, Box 564, 75122, Uppsala, Sweden;Centre for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Falun, Sweden;Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine Section, Uppsala University, Box 564, 75122, Uppsala, Sweden;Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden;School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden;Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research Section, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;

关键词: General practitioners;    Primary health care;    Focus group discussions;    Sick leave;    Certification of sickness absence;    Social security system;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12875-015-0238-5

 received in 2014-05-22, accepted in 2015-02-03,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundMany physicians in Sweden, as well as in other countries, find the matter of certification of sickness absence (COSA) particularly burdensome. The issuing of COSAs has also been perceived as a work-environment problem among physicians. Among general practitioners (GPs) are the highest proportion of physicians in Sweden who experience difficulties with COSA. Swedish authorities have created several initiatives, by changing the social security system, to improve the rehabilitation of people who are ill and decrease the number of days of sick leave used. The aim of this study was to describe how GPs in Sweden perceive their work with COSA after these changes.MethodsA descriptive design with a qualitative, inductive focus-group discussion (FGD) approach was used.ResultsFour categories emerged from the analysis of FGDs with GPs in Sweden: 1) Physicians’ difficulties in their professional role; 2) Collaboration with other professionals facilitates the COSA; 3) Physicians’ approach in relation to the patient; 4) An easier COSA process.ConclusionsSwedish GPs still perceived COSA to be a burdensome task. However, system changes in recent years have facilitated work related to COSA. Cooperation with other professionals on COSA was perceived positively.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Carlsson et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015