Urban-rural inequality regarding drug prescriptions in primary care facilities – a pre-post comparison of the National Essential Medicines Scheme of China

International Journal for Equity in Health

Research Article

Zhiyong Liu¹  Qiang Yao²  Ju Sun²  J. Adamm Ferrier³  Chaojie Liu³ 

[1] School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030, Wuhan, Hubei, China;School of Political Science and Public Administration, Wuhan University, 430072, Wuhan, Hubei, China;School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 3086, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;

关键词: Primary health care;    Physician’s practice patterns;    Essential medicines;    Inequalities;    China;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12939-015-0186-7

 received in 2015-02-26, accepted in 2015-07-17,  发布年份 2015

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of the National Essential Medicines Scheme (NEMS) with respect to urban-rural inequalities regarding drug prescriptions in primary care facilities.MethodsA stratified two-stage random sampling strategy was used to sample 23,040 prescriptions from 192 primary care facilities from 2009 to 2010. Difference-in-Difference (DID) analyses were performed to test the association between NEMS and urban-rural gaps in prescription patterns. Between-Group Variance and Theil Index were calculated to measure urban-rural absolute and relative disparities in drug prescriptions.ResultsThe use of the Essential Medicines List (EML) achieved a compliance rate of up to 90 % in both urban and rural facilities. An overall reduction of average prescription cost improved economic access to drugs for patients in both areas. However, we observed an increased urban-rural disparity in average expenditure per prescription. The rate of antibiotics and glucocorticoids prescription remained high, despite a reduced disparity between urban and rural facilities. The average incidence of antibiotic prescription increased slightly in urban facilities (62 to 63 %) and reduced in rural facilities (67 % to 66 %). The urban-rural disparity in the use of parenteral administration (injections and infusions) increased, albeit at a high level in both areas (44 %-52 %).ConclusionNEMS interventions are effective in reducing the overall average prescription costs. Despite the increased use of the EML, indicator performances with respect to rational drug prescribing and use remain poor and exceed the WHO/INRUD recommended cutoff values and worldwide benchmarks. There is an increased gap between urban and rural areas in the use of parenteral administration and expenditure per prescription.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   
© Yao et al. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.