The influence of baseline risk on the relation between HbA1c and risk for new cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and symptomatic cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular Diabetology

Original Investigation

Hendrik M. W. Nathoe¹  Jaap L. Kappelle²  Frank L. J. Visseren³  Jan Westerink³  Gert Jan de Borst⁴  Yolanda van der Graaf⁵  Sophie H. Bots⁶ 

[1] Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands;Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands;University College Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands;

关键词: HbA1c;    Cardiovascular disease;    High risk population;    Type 2 diabetes;    Glycaemic control;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12933-016-0418-1

 received in 2016-04-14, accepted in 2016-07-04,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundStrict glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes has proven to have microvascular benefits while the effects on CVD and mortality are less clear, especially in high risk patients. Whether strict glycaemic control would reduce the risk of future CVD or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing CVD, is unknown. This study aims to evaluate whether the relation between baseline HbA1c and new cardiovascular events or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) is modified by baseline vascular risk.MethodsA cohort of 1096 patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD from the Second Manifestations of ARTerial Disease (SMART) study was followed. The relation between HbA1c at baseline and future vascular events (composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular mortality) and all-cause mortality was evaluated with Cox proportional hazard analyses in a population that was stratified for baseline risk for vascular events as calculated with the SMART risk score. The mean follow-up duration was 6.9 years for all-cause mortality and 6.4 years for vascular events, in which period 243 and 223 cases were reported, respectively.ResultsA 1 % increase in HbA1c was associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality (HR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.06–1.31). This association was also found in the highest SMART risk quartile (HR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.11–1.60). There was no relation between HbA1c and the occurrence of cardiovascular events during follow-up (HR 1.03, 95 % CI 0.91–1.16). The interaction term between HbA1c and SMART risk score was not significantly related to any of the outcomes.ConclusionIn patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD, HbA1c is related to the risk of all-cause mortality, but not to the risk of cardiovascular events. The relation between HbA1c and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and vascular disease is not dependent on baseline vascular risk.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2016