Novel optimum contribution selection methods accounting for conflicting objectives in breeding programs for livestock breeds with historical migration

Genetics Selection Evolution

Research Article

Yu Wang¹  Jörn Bennewitz¹  Robin Wellmann¹ 

[1] Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70593, Stuttgart, Germany;

关键词: Genetic Gain;    Genetic Contribution;    Selection Candidate;    Local Breed;    Estimate Breeding Value;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12711-017-0320-7

 received in 2016-06-30, accepted in 2017-05-03,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundOptimum contribution selection (OCS) is effective for increasing genetic gain, controlling the rate of inbreeding and enables maintenance of genetic diversity. However, this diversity may be caused by high migrant contributions (MC) in the population due to introgression of genetic material from other breeds, which can threaten the conservation of small local populations. Therefore, breeding objectives should not only focus on increasing genetic gains but also on maintaining genetic originality and diversity of native alleles. This study aimed at investigating whether OCS was improved by including MC and modified kinships that account for breed origin of alleles. Three objective functions were considered for minimizing kinship, minimizing MC and maximizing genetic gain in the offspring generation, and we investigated their effects on German Angler and Vorderwald cattle.ResultsIn most scenarios, the results were similar for Angler and Vorderwald cattle. A significant positive correlation between MC and estimated breeding values of the selection candidates was observed for both breeds, thus traditional OCS would increase MC. Optimization was performed under the condition that the rate of inbreeding did not exceed 1% and at least 30% of the maximum progress was achieved for all other criteria. Although traditional OCS provided the highest breeding values under restriction of classical kinship, the magnitude of MC in the progeny generation was not controlled. When MC were constrained or minimized, the kinship at native alleles increased compared to the reference scenario. Thus, in addition to constraining MC, constraining kinship at native alleles is required to ensure that native genetic diversity is maintained. When kinship at native alleles was constrained, the classical kinship was automatically lowered in most cases and more sires were selected. However, the average breeding value in the next generation was also lower than that obtained with traditional OCS.ConclusionsFor local breeds with historical introgressions, current breeding programs should focus on increasing genetic gain and controlling inbreeding, as well as maintaining the genetic originality of the breeds and the diversity of native alleles via the inclusion of MC and kinship at native alleles in the OCS process.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2017

【 图 表 】

12936_2017_1885_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 6

Fig. 5

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

12888_2023_5299_Article_IEq6.gif

12888_2023_5299_Article_IEq5.gif

12888_2023_5299_Article_IEq4.gif

12888_2023_5299_Article_IEq3.gif

12888_2023_5299_Article_IEq2.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 8

Fig. 6

12888_2023_5299_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 1

12936_2017_2051_Article_IEq71.gif

Fig. 5

Fig. 1

40708_2023_205_Article_IEq19.gif

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

40708_2023_205_Article_IEq12.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

12944_2017_533_Article_IEq2.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 7

Fig. 5

Fig. 1

12864_2023_9693_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

12936_2015_665_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

12936_2017_2051_Article_IEq54.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 12

Fig. 5

12936_2017_2014_Article_IEq61.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

12936_2015_966_Article_IEq12.gif

Fig. 5

12936_2016_1315_Article_IEq9.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

12944_2023_1932_Article_IEq4.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

12944_2023_1932_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

12936_2016_1315_Article_IEq8.gif

Fig. 5

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

12864_2017_4133_Article_IEq35.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

12951_2016_171_Article_IEq6.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

12951_2016_225_Article_IEq2.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 6

Fig. 11

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

12951_2016_171_Article_IEq5.gif

13731_2023_319_Article_IEq9.gif

Fig. 3

13731_2023_319_Article_IEq6.gif

Fig. 7

Fig. 2

Fig. 6

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq88.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

12951_2016_225_Article_IEq3.gif

Fig. 4

12936_2023_4742_Article_IEq70.gif

Fig. 6

Fig. 4

12951_2016_171_Article_IEq3.gif

Fig. 10

Fig. 2

13731_2023_319_Article_IEq4.gif

13731_2023_319_Article_IEq3.gif

Fig. 4

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq86.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

12936_2023_4742_Article_IEq53.gif

Fig. 9

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

12951_2016_171_Article_IEq1.gif

12936_2023_4742_Article_IEq36.gif

Fig. 5

Fig. 5

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 5

12951_2017_252_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

12936_2023_4742_Article_IEq20.gif

Fig. 1

12936_2023_4742_Article_IEq18.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 8

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 4

12936_2016_1411_Article_IEq110.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2