Management of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units: a mixed methods study assessing barriers and facilitators to guideline adherence

BMC Infectious Diseases

Research Article

Anping Xie¹  Ann Schoofs Hundt²  Pascale Carayon²  Matthew Hall³  Jackson S Musuuza⁴  Kenneth Wood⁵  Nasia Safdar⁶ 

[1] Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA;Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Infectious Medicine, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA;Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA;R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA;William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA;Department of Infectious Disease, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA;

关键词: Ventilator-associated pneumonia;    VAP;    Guidelines;    Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety;    Barriers and facilitators;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12879-016-1665-1

 received in 2015-10-27, accepted in 2016-06-24,  发布年份 2016

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundGuidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America/The American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) provide recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). However, the mere presence of guidelines is rarely sufficient to promote widespread adoption and uptake. Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model framework, we undertook a study to understand barriers and facilitators to the adoption of the IDSA/ATS guidelines.MethodsWe conducted surveys and focus group discussions of different health care providers involved in the management of VAP. The setting was medical-surgical ICUs at a tertiary academic hospital and a large multispecialty rural hospital in Wisconsin, USA.ResultsOverall, we found that 55 % of participants indicated that they were aware of the IDSA/ATS guideline. The top ranked barriers to VAP management included: 1) having multiple physician groups managing VAP, 2) variation in VAP management by differing ICU services, 3) physicians and level of training, and 4) renal failure complicating doses of antibiotics.Facilitators to VAP management included presence of multidisciplinary rounds that include nurses, pharmacist and respiratory therapists, and awareness of the IDSA/ATS guideline. This awareness was associated with receiving effective training on management of VAP, keeping up to date on nosocomial infection literature, and belief that performing a bronchoscopy to diagnose VAP would help with expeditious diagnosis of VAP.ConclusionsFindings from our study complement existing studies by identifying perceptions of the many different types of healthcare workers in ICU settings. These findings have implications for antibiotic stewardship teams, clinicians, and organizational leaders.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2016