期刊论文详细信息
BMC Genetics
Prediction of genomic breeding values for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in a multi-breed sheep population using a HD SNP chip
Research Article
John C. McEwan1  Wendy E. Bain1  Ken G. Dodds1  Shannon M. Clarke1  Flávio S. Schenkel2  Stephen P. Miller3  Luiz F. Brito3  Mehdi Sargolzaei4  Natalie K. Pickering5 
[1] AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, 9053, Mosgiel, New Zealand;Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, N1G2W1, Guelph, Canada;Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, N1G2W1, Guelph, Canada;AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, 9053, Mosgiel, New Zealand;Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, N1G2W1, Guelph, Canada;The Semex Alliance, N1H6J2, Guelph, Canada;Focus Genetics, 4110, Napier, New Zealand;
关键词: GBLUP;    Ovine HD SNP Chip;    Genomic selection;    Eating quality traits;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12863-017-0476-8
 received in 2016-10-11, accepted in 2017-01-13,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundNew Zealand has some unique Terminal Sire composite sheep breeds, which were developed in the last three decades to meet commercial needs. These composite breeds were developed based on crossing various Terminal Sire and Maternal breeds and, therefore, present high genetic diversity compared to other sheep breeds. Their breeding programs are focused on improving carcass and meat quality traits. There is an interest from the industry to implement genomic selection in this population to increase the rates of genetic gain. Therefore, the main objectives of this study were to determine the accuracy of predicted genomic breeding values for various growth, carcass and meat quality traits using a HD SNP chip and to evaluate alternative genomic relationship matrices, validation designs and genomic prediction scenarios. A large multi-breed population (n = 14,845) was genotyped with the HD SNP chip (600 K) and phenotypes were collected for a variety of traits.ResultsThe average observed accuracies (± SD) for traits measured in the live animal, carcass, and, meat quality traits ranged from 0.18 ± 0.07 to 0.33 ± 0.10, 0.28 ± 0.09 to 0.55 ± 0.05 and 0.21 ± 0.07 to 0.36 ± 0.08, respectively, depending on the scenario/method used in the genomic predictions. When accounting for population stratification by adjusting for 2, 4 or 6 principal components (PCs) the observed accuracies of molecular breeding values (mBVs) decreased or kept constant for all traits. The mBVs observed accuracies when fitting both G and A matrices were similar to fitting only G matrix. The lowest accuracies were observed for k-means cross-validation and forward validation performed within each k-means cluster.ConclusionsThe accuracies observed in this study support the feasibility of genomic selection for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in New Zealand Terminal Sire breeds using the Ovine HD SNP chip. There was a clear advantage on using a mixed training population instead of performing analyzes per genomic clusters. In order to perform genomic predictions per breed group, genotyping more animals is recommended to increase the size of the training population within each group and the genetic relationship between training and validation populations. The different scenarios evaluated in this study will help geneticists and breeders to make wiser decisions in their breeding programs.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311105649423ZK.pdf 994KB PDF download
MediaObjects/12951_2022_1747_MOESM1_ESM.pdf 1907KB PDF download
Fig. 1 5136KB Image download
Fig. 3 595KB Image download
Fig. 3 1801KB Image download
Fig. 4 183KB Image download
Fig. 7 372KB Image download
Fig. 1 206KB Image download
Fig. 1 2201KB Image download
12936_2017_1932_Article_IEq15.gif 1KB Image download
12936_2017_2051_Article_IEq86.gif 1KB Image download
【 图 表 】

12936_2017_2051_Article_IEq86.gif

12936_2017_1932_Article_IEq15.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 7

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  • [36]
  • [37]
  • [38]
  • [39]
  • [40]
  • [41]
  • [42]
  • [43]
  • [44]
  • [45]
  • [46]
  • [47]
  • [48]
  • [49]
  • [50]
  • [51]
  • [52]
  • [53]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次