Efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Oral Health

Research

Na Liu¹  Qing Liu²  Ting Li²  Qiaoyu Hu²  Jiadi Yang²  Yanhui Peng² 

[1] Department of Preventive Dentistry, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, No. 383, Zhongshan East Road, 050017, Shijiazhuang, PR China;Hebei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Hebei Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical University, 050017, Shijiazhuang, China;

关键词: Oral candidiasis;    Candida;    Photodynamic therapy;    Photochemotherapy;    Meta-analysis;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12903-023-03484-z

 received in 2023-03-01, accepted in 2023-10-03,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct or alternative to traditional antifungal drugs in the treatment of oral candidiasis, and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for its use in the treatment of oral candidiasis.MethodsComputer combined with manual retrieval of China Academic Journals Full-text Database (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus retrieval for articles published before January 2023, basic information and required data were extracted according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the Revman V5.4 software was used to conduct Meta-analysis of the included literature.ResultsA total of 11 articles were included, 7 of which used nystatin as an antifungal drug, 2 of which were combined treatment of PDT and nystatin, 2 of the remaining 4 articles were treated with fluconazole, and 2 were treated with miconazole. Meta results showed that PDT was superior to nystatin in reducing the number of oral candida colonies in the palate of patients MD = -0.87, 95%CI = (-1.52,-0.23), P = 0.008, the difference was statistically significant, and the denture site MD = -1.03, 95%CI = (-2.21, -0.15), P = 0.09, the difference was not statistically significant; compared with the efficacy of fluconazole, RR = 1.01, 95%CI = (0.56,1.83), P = 0.96; compared with miconazole RR = 0.55, 95%CI = (0.38, 0.81), P = 0.002; PDT combined with nystatin RR = 1.27, 95%CI = (1.06, 1.52), P = 0.01; recurrence rate RR = 0.28, 95%CI = (0.09, 0.88), P = 0.03.ConclusionsPDT was effective in the treatment of oral candidiasis; PDT was more effective than nystatin for the treatment of denture stomatitis in the palate, while there was no significant difference between the two for the denture site; The efficacy of PDT for oral candidiasis was similar to that of fluconazole; PDT was less effective than miconazole for oral candidiasis; Compared with nystatin alone, the combination of PDT and nystatin is more effective in treating oral candidiasis with less risk of recurrence.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

12936_2015_894_Article_IEq86.gif

Fig. 7

Fig. 2

Fig. 6

12888_2023_5299_Article_IEq5.gif