期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Automated left ventricular diastolic function evaluation from phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance and comparison with Doppler echocardiography
Research
Ludivine Perdrix1  Alain De Cesare2  Muriel Lefort2  Emilie Bollache2  Alain Herment2  Nadjia Kachenoura2  Benoît Diebold3  Magalie Ladouceur4  Elie Mousseaux4  Carine Defrance4  Alban Redheuil4  Stéphanie Clément-Guinaudeau5 
[1] Echocardiography department, APHP, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France;INSERM U678/UPMC Univ Paris 6, 91 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France;INSERM U678/UPMC Univ Paris 6, 91 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France;Echocardiography department, APHP, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France;INSERM U678/UPMC Univ Paris 6, 91 Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France;Radiology department, APHP, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France;Radiology department, APHP, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France;
关键词: Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance;    Diastolic Dysfunction;    Longitudinal Velocity;    Aortic Valve Stenosis;    Aortic Flow;   
DOI  :  10.1186/1532-429X-12-63
 received in 2010-06-16, accepted in 2010-11-09,  发布年份 2010
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundEarly detection of diastolic dysfunction is crucial for patients with incipient heart failure. Although this evaluation could be performed from phase-contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data, its usefulness in clinical routine is not yet established, mainly because the interpretation of such data remains mostly based on manual post-processing. Accordingly, our goal was to develop a robust process to automatically estimate velocity and flow rate-related diastolic parameters from PC-CMR data and to test the consistency of these parameters against echocardiography as well as their ability to characterize left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction.ResultsWe studied 35 controls and 18 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and preserved LV ejection fraction who had PC-CMR and Doppler echocardiography exams on the same day. PC-CMR mitral flow and myocardial velocity data were analyzed using custom software for semi-automated extraction of diastolic parameters. Inter-operator reproducibility of flow pattern segmentation and functional parameters was assessed on a sub-group of 30 subjects. The mean percentage of overlap between the transmitral flow segmentations performed by two independent operators was 99.7 ± 1.6%, resulting in a small variability (<1.96 ± 2.95%) in functional parameter measurement. For maximal myocardial longitudinal velocities, the inter-operator variability was 4.25 ± 5.89%. The MR diastolic parameters varied significantly in patients as opposed to controls (p < 0.0002). Both velocity and flow rate diastolic parameters were consistent with echocardiographic values (r > 0.71) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed their ability to separate patients from controls, with sensitivity > 0.80, specificity > 0.80 and accuracy > 0.85. Slight superiority in terms of correlation with echocardiography (r = 0.81) and accuracy to detect LV abnormalities (sensitivity > 0.83, specificity > 0.91 and accuracy > 0.89) was found for the PC-CMR flow-rate related parameters.ConclusionsA fast and reproducible technique for flow and myocardial PC-CMR data analysis was successfully used on controls and patients to extract consistent velocity-related diastolic parameters, as well as flow rate-related parameters. This technique provides a valuable addition to established CMR tools in the evaluation and the management of patients with diastolic dysfunction.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© Bollache et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311104983298ZK.pdf 2951KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  • [24]
  • [25]
  • [26]
  • [27]
  • [28]
  • [29]
  • [30]
  • [31]
  • [32]
  • [33]
  • [34]
  • [35]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:5次 浏览次数:0次