Venous dilation effect of hot towel (moist and dry heat) versus hot pack for peripheral intravenous catheterization: a quasi-experimental study

Journal of Physiological Anthropology

Original Article

Inaho Shishido¹  Rika Yano¹  Sanae Kaga¹  Michito Murayama¹  Kae Yasuda² 

[1] Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12, W5, Kita-Ku, 060-0812, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan;Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12, W5, Kita-Ku, 060-0812, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan;

关键词: Heating;    Hot towel;    Hot pack;    Venous dilation;    Vein;    Skin temperature;    Peripheral intravenous catheterization;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40101-023-00340-5

 received in 2023-06-25, accepted in 2023-09-22,  发布年份 2023

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundHeat application before peripheral intravenous catheterization is recommended for venous dilation. Hot pack application enlarges the venous diameter in healthy adults; however, hot towels (moist and dry heat) are used often in some medical cases. However, it is unclear whether hot towel application promotes venous dilation better than hot pack application. This study compared the venous dilation effect of using a hot towel (moist and dry heat) to a hot pack before applying the tourniquet at an access site for peripheral intravenous catheterization.MethodsEighty-eight healthy females aged 18–29 years were recruited for this quasi-experimental study. They underwent three types of heat applications (hot pack, moist hot towel, and dry hot towel [moist hot towel wrapped in a dry plastic bag], all of which were warmed to 40 ± 2 °C and performed for 7 min) to their forearm and tourniquet application for 30 s after each heating. Venous diameter and depth were measured using ultrasonography, and venous palpability and visibility (venous assessment score) was observed as venous dilatation effects. In addition, the skin temperature, stratum corneum hydration, and subjective evaluation of the warmth were measured.ResultsThere were no significant differences in venous diameter and assessment scores after intervention between the dry hot towel and the hot pack groups, and the effect size was negligible (Cohen’s d < 0.20). However, these measurements were significantly lower for the moist hot towel than for the other two heat applications (P < .001). Although there was no significant difference in skin temperature and warmth rating score between the dry hot towel and the hot pack, these were significantly lower for the moist hot towel than for the other two heat applications (P < .001). The amount of change in stratum corneum hydration of the dry hot towel was not significantly different from that of the hot pack; however, that of the moist hot towel was significantly larger than that of the other two heat applications (P < . 001.)ConclusionsA method in which a towel warmed in hot water is wrapped in a dry barrier may be an alternative to a hot pack.Trial registrationThis study was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (Registration No.: UMIN000048308. Registered on July 7, 2022).

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

12888_2023_5256_Article_IEq1.gif