期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Splenic T1-mapping: a novel quantitative method for assessing adenosine stress adequacy for cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Research
George Krasopoulos1  Mario Petrou1  Keith M. Channon2  Stefan K. Piechnik3  Eylem Levelt3  Stefan Neubauer3  Rohan S. Wijesurendra3  Masliza Mahmod3  Vanessa M. Ferreira3  Rina Ariga3  Alexander Liu3  John C. Forfar4  Rajesh K. Kharbanda5  Andreas Greiser6 
[1] Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK;Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK;Oxford Heart Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK;Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany;
关键词: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance;    Adenosine stress;    Splenic T1;    Switch-off;    ShMOLLI;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12968-016-0318-2
 received in 2016-10-08, accepted in 2016-12-20,  发布年份 2017
来源: Springer
PDF
【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPerfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed with inadequate adenosine stress leads to false-negative results and suboptimal clinical management. The recently proposed marker of adequate stress, the “splenic switch-off” sign, detects splenic blood flow attenuation during stress perfusion (spleen appears dark), but can only be assessed after gadolinium first-pass, when it is too late to optimize the stress response. Reduction in splenic blood volume during adenosine stress is expected to shorten native splenic T1, which may predict splenic switch-off without the need for gadolinium.MethodsTwo-hundred and twelve subjects underwent adenosine stress CMR: 1.5 T (n = 104; 75 patients, 29 healthy controls); 3 T (n = 108; 86 patients, 22 healthy controls). Native T1spleen was assessed using heart-rate-independent ShMOLLI prototype sequence at rest and during adenosine stress (140 μg/kg/min, 4 min, IV) in 3 short-axis slices (basal, mid-ventricular, apical). This was compared with changes in peak splenic perfusion signal intensity (ΔSIspleen) and the “splenic switch-off” sign on conventional stress/rest gadolinium perfusion imaging. T1spleen values were obtained blinded to perfusion ΔSIspleen, both were derived using regions of interest carefully placed to avoid artefacts and partial-volume effects.ResultsNormal resting splenic T1 values were 1102 ± 66 ms (1.5 T) and 1352 ± 114 ms (3 T), slightly higher than in patients (1083 ± 59 ms, p = 0.04; 1295 ± 105 ms, p = 0.01, respectively). T1spleen decreased significantly during adenosine stress (mean ΔT1spleen ~ −40 ms), independent of field strength, age, gender, and cardiovascular diseases. While ΔT1spleen correlated strongly with ΔSIspleen (rho = 0.70, p < 0.0001); neither indices showed significant correlations with conventional hemodynamic markers (rate pressure product) during stress. By ROC analysis, a ΔT1spleen threshold of ≥ −30 ms during stress predicted the “splenic switch-off” sign (AUC 0.90, p < 0.0001) with sensitivity (90%), specificity (88%), accuracy (90%), PPV (98%), NPV (42%).ConclusionsAdenosine stress and rest splenic T1-mapping is a novel method for assessing stress responses, independent of conventional hemodynamic parameters. It enables prediction of the visual “splenic switch-off” sign without the need for gadolinium, and correlates well to changes in splenic signal intensity during stress/rest perfusion imaging. ΔT1spleen holds promise to facilitate optimization of stress responses before gadolinium first-pass perfusion CMR.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
RO202311104340052ZK.pdf 1992KB PDF download
【 参考文献 】
  • [1]
  • [2]
  • [3]
  • [4]
  • [5]
  • [6]
  • [7]
  • [8]
  • [9]
  • [10]
  • [11]
  • [12]
  • [13]
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]
  • [17]
  • [18]
  • [19]
  • [20]
  • [21]
  • [22]
  • [23]
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:2次 浏览次数:0次