Child and parent predictors of picky eating from preschool to school age

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Research

Clare H. Llewellyn¹  Silje Steinsbekk²  Lars Wichstrøm³  Arielle Bonneville-Roussy⁴  Alison Fildes⁵ 

[1] Department of Behavioural Science & Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 7HB, London, UK;Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Dragvoll, 7491, Trondheim, Norway;Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Dragvoll, 7491, Trondheim, Norway;NTNU Social Research, 7491, Trondheim, Norway;Grove House, Roehampton Lane, Roehampton University, SW15 5PJ, London, UK;School of Psychology, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK;

关键词: Picky eating;    Pickiness;    Fussiness;    Sensory sensitivity;    Parenting;    Structuring;    Sensitivity;    Temperament;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12966-017-0542-7

 received in 2017-03-30, accepted in 2017-06-27,  发布年份 2017

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundPicky eating is prevalent in childhood. Because pickiness concerns parents and is associated with nutrient deficiency and psychological problems, the antecedents of pickiness need to be identified. We propose an etiological model of picky eating involving child temperament, sensory sensitivity and parent-child interaction.MethodsTwo cohorts of 4-year olds (born 2003 or 2004) in Trondheim, Norway were invited to participate (97.2% attendance; 82.0% consent rate, n = 2475) and a screen-stratified subsample of 1250 children was recruited. We interviewed 997 parents about their child’s pickiness and sensory sensitivity using the Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA). Two years later, 795 of the parents completed the interview. The Children’s Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) was used to assess children’s temperament. Parent- child interactions were videotaped and parental sensitivity (i.e., parental awareness and appropriate responsiveness to children’s verbal and nonverbal cues) and structuring were rated using the Emotional Availability Scales (EAS).ResultsAt both measurement times, 26% of the children were categorized as picky eaters. Pickiness was moderately stable from preschool to school age (OR = 5.92, CI = 3.95, 8.86), and about half of those who displayed pickiness at age 4 were also picky eaters two years later. While accounting for pickiness at age 4, sensory sensitivity at age 4 predicted pickiness at age 6 (OR = 1.25, CI = 1.08, 2.23), whereas temperamental surgency (OR = 0.88, CI = 0.64, 1.22) and negative affectivity (OR = 1.17, CI = 0.75, 1.84) did not. Parental structuring was found to reduce the risk of children’s picky eating two years later (OR = 0.90, CI = 0.82, 0.99), whereas parental sensitivity increased the odds for pickiness (OR = 1.10, CI = 1.00, 1.21).ConclusionsAlthough pickiness is stable from preschool to school age, children who are more sensory sensitive are at higher risk for pickiness two years later, as are children whose parents display relatively higher levels of sensitivity and lower levels of structuring. Our findings suggest that interventions targeting children’s sensory sensitivity, as well as parental sensitivity and structuring, might reduce the risk of childhood pickiness. Health care providers should support parents of picky eaters in repeatedly offering unfamiliar and rejected foods to their children without pressure and acknowledging child autonomy.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s). 2017