Assessing the incorporation of battery degradation in vehicle-to-grid optimization models

Energy Informatics

Research

Florian Biedenbach¹  Valentin Preis¹ 

[1] Forschungsstelle für Energiewirtschaft e.V., Am Blütenanger 71, 80995, Munich, Germany;

关键词: Cyclic aging;    Battery degradation;    Linear optimization;    Vehicle-to-grid;    Bidirectional charging;    Electric vehicle;    Electromobility;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s42162-023-00288-x

来源: Springer

【 摘 要 】

Bidirectional charging allows energy from the electric vehicles (EV) to be fed back into the grid, offering the possibility of price-optimized charging. However, such strategies cause higher charging cycles, which affect the cyclic aging of the battery and reduce its service life, resulting in additional costs for the user. Various approaches are used to account for battery degradation in optimizations models of bidirectional charging use-cases. In this paper, a systematic literature review is carried out to identify existing battery degradation models and to determine the most suitable one. In the models under review, degradation is integrated into the optimization’s objective function. The review shows that there are mainly two strategies suitable for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) optimization problems: A weighted Ah-throughput model (wAh-model) with a constant degradation cost factor and a performance based model (pb-model) linking the degradation to measurable parameters such as capacity loss. Both models were implemented and analyzed. The results show that the wAh-model is the better optimization option, as in the pb-model the current state of health of the battery has an excessively large impact on the calculated degradation cost. It leads to excess costs due to a higher aging rate at the beginning of life which proves to be not ideal in the optimization. The sensitivity analysis reveals that altering the initial State of Health (SoH) from 95 % in the base scenario to 100 % leads to an increase in average degradation costs by factor 9.71 in the pb-model. From the evaluated base scenario the average degradation costs for the pb-model are 0.45 cent/kWh and for the wAh-model 0.23 cent/kWh.

【 授权许可】

CC BY   
© The Author(s) 2023

【 图 表 】

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq56.gif

Fig. 3

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq36.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

12936_2017_1963_Article_IEq63.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

12936_2017_1932_Article_IEq37.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq54.gif

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq53.gif

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq34.gif

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq33.gif

12936_2016_1316_Article_IEq8.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 8

12936_2017_1963_Article_IEq60.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 7

Fig. 9

Fig. 5

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

12951_2017_255_Article_IEq32.gif

Fig. 1

40170_2023_319_Article_IEq3.gif

13046_2023_2867_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 6

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq49.gif

Fig. 4

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 6

12936_2015_894_Article_IEq28.gif

Fig. 5

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq47.gif

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 7

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 6

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 3

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq44.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 4

12951_2017_297_Article_IEq1.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 6

Fig. 1

12936_2017_2075_Article_IEq45.gif

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 8

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq42.gif

Fig. 2

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq40.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 1

12936_2017_1963_Article_IEq15.gif

Fig. 4

12951_2017_277_Article_IEq1.gif

12936_2017_2075_Article_IEq41.gif

12936_2017_1938_Article_IEq2.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

12864_2015_2198_Article_IEq1.gif

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq39.gif

Fig. 3

12936_2017_1866_Article_IEq9.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 2

12936_2015_894_Article_IEq17.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 1

12951_2015_155_Article_IEq37.gif

13690_2023_1196_Figb_HTML.png

13690_2023_1196_Figa_HTML.png

Fig. 1

12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq25.gif

12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq24.gif

Fig. 2

Fig. 5

12936_2017_2075_Article_IEq38.gif

Fig. 3

12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq21.gif

12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq20.gif

12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq18.gif

12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq16.gif

12888_2023_5256_Article_IEq1.gif

12944_2023_1927_Article_IEq7.gif